High-end chains like Dura-Ace or Super Record are often lauded for hill climbing, but is this praise warranted or just sales talk? The truth is, these high-end chains do offer tangible benefits, but they come at a cost. The reduced weight of these chains is noticeable, and the improved shifting can make a difference on steep inclines. However, the question remains whether these advantages are significant enough to justify the price difference.
In real-world hill climbing scenarios with a triple crankset, I've noticed that the high-end chains do shift more smoothly, and this smoothness can be beneficial on long, steep climbs. But, the more affordable chains, like Shimano Ultegra or SRAM Rival, also offer reliable performance.
The durability of high-end chains is often cited as a reason for their superiority, but this is subjective and depends on the rider's use and maintenance habits. In terms of actual differences, the high-end chains offer a smoother, more precise shifting experience, but the more affordable chains are not far behind.
So, are high-end chains a myth or a reality for hill climbing? They do offer tangible benefits, but the more affordable chains also provide reliable performance. The choice ultimately depends on the rider's budget and preferences.
