General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

What Drug Shortage?

Started by mfg · · Last activity · 3 posts · 395 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 October 2003
Last activity
31 October 2003
Original author
mfg
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
395
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.globeandmail.com

    Globe and Mail, Thursday Oct 30, page A 17

    Is Big Pharma Pulling Canada's Chain?
    Alan Cassels

    It's as if there were a sign outside Tunney's Pasture, Health Canada's
    home in Ottawa, that reads, "Gone Fishing." For as pressure mounts
    from American pharmaceutical manufacturers for Canada to stop selling
    our cheaper drugs to Americans via the Internet, Health Canada is
    casting for evidence that the cross-border trade may be causing drug
    shortages here at home.

    But Health Canada officials might as well stow their rods; they'll
    only find red herrings. The fact is that despite repeated warnings of
    the disaster that will befall Canadians when angry U.S. drug companies
    restrict their supply of drugs to Canada, no one has produced such
    evidence. Nor are they likely to.

    Canadians can ignore "the sky is falling" pronouncements about
    shortages in our pharmaceutical supply -- because at the end of the
    day, money talks. And multinational drug companies are still extremely
    profitable in Canada.

    Will Big Pharma companies restrict their supply of billions of dollars
    worth of product to Canada because a tiny portion gets sold back to
    U.S. customers at lower prices? Given that logic, U.S. pharmaceutical
    manufacturers would have to restrict supply to every country that has
    cheaper prices and Internet connections -- which means most of the
    world.

    The main issue here is visibility and precedent. Earlier this year,
    there was news of a leaked U.S. pharmaceutical manufacturers' document
    which said the industry was earmarking $1-million (U.S.) to "change
    the Canadian health-care system."

    Well, what we're seeing now is that lobbying money at work. As long as
    there are large price discrepancies between our two countries, Canada
    and our policies will naturally be in the crosshairs of the U.S.
    drug-makers. Before we allow our federal health agency out on another
    fishing expedition, let's remember that this latest red herring swims
    alongside a large school of equally fatuous pseudo-warnings issued by
    federal health regulators on both sides of the border.

    Because U.S. citizens are paying some of the highest prescription drug
    prices in the world, they naturally turn to the Internet for cheaper
    options. Canada is a relatively trustworthy neighbour, with some good
    recent history of supplying cheaper branded drugs to seniors living
    along the border, so we've become the pharmacy of choice.

    And not just for individuals: The governors of Minnesota, Illinois,
    Iowa and Wisconsin have all announced that they want to import cheaper
    medicines from Canada, thereby saving state budgets and taxpayers
    millions. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich estimates that his state
    could save as much as $56.5-million a year on prescription drugs for
    state employees and retirees by reimporting American-made drugs from
    countries with cheaper prices.

    Ah, ask critics, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, are
    those drugs safe? And who will pay for the research and development of
    future medicines if U.S. pharma loses too much revenue?

    More red-herring distractions. The fact is, most American brand-name
    drugs, when they aren't made in places like New Jersey, come from
    places like Puerto Rico, usually using the same processes, quality
    standards and safeguards as U.S.-based manufacturers. If a drug
    becomes "unsafe" every time it crosses a border, then U.S. citizens
    should be concerned about their entire drug supply.

    What about the fear that Canadian-style price-controls could inhibit
    the development of new drugs? Drug-industry supporters call countries
    that control drug prices "parasites." The industry often says that
    those paying cheaper prices are being subsidized by U.S. research and
    development, which is in turn funded by high U.S. prices.

    This argument might hold some water, were it not for the fact that the
    U.S. drug industry spends about three times more money marketing its
    products than researching them in the first place. Here's a reverse
    question: Should Canadians be subsidizing Americans' habit of being
    bombarded by drug ads?

    What Health Canada ought to do is go fishing for evidence that
    U.S.-style drug ads are being unleashed here in our country. They may
    catch more than they bargained for.

    Alan Cassels is a drug policy researcher with University of Victoria's
    School of Health Information Science.

  2. mfg said:


    http://www.globeandmail.com

    Globe and Mail, Thursday Oct 30, page A 17

    Is Big Pharma Pulling Canada's Chain?
    Alan Cassels

    It's as if there were a sign outside Tunney's Pasture, Health Canada's
    home in Ottawa, that reads, "Gone Fishing." For as pressure mounts
    from American pharmaceutical manufacturers for Canada to stop selling
    our cheaper drugs to Americans via the Internet, Health Canada is
    casting for evidence that the cross-border trade may be causing drug
    shortages here at home.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>>>>>>> snipped >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    While this has little to do with
    sci.med.cardiology, it may be more relevant
    than the two
    foot-pound-litre-metre-quart-gallon-lightyear-angstrom-lumen
    diet, but not nearly as much fun.

    This is a most interesting state of affairs.
    The United States, alone in the world, is
    dedicated to an entirely free market in most
    goods. Their competition laws are the best in
    the world at ensuring consumers obtain
    competitive prices for as many purchases as
    possible. For these reasons already, it is
    incomprehensible as to why drugs sold in the
    United States have the highest prices in the
    world.

    While Canadian prices are cheaper, they were,
    until about 15 years ago even cheaper yet.
    Uncompeting, price fixing, drug companies had
    had reduced patent protection for their
    products since the fifties or sixties,
    allowing the quick entry of extremely cheap
    generic brands. Powerful lobbying from
    Washington on the Conservative government of
    Brian Mulroney restored extended patent
    protection and higher prices in the late 80's
    with the proviso that prices of then existing
    drugs NOT increase too rapidly.

    In the end, if drug companies fail to supply
    Canada's needs and those of Americans wishing
    to do some cross-border shopping (within our
    "free trade" agreements), then Canada may
    have to revert to a policy of reduced patent
    protection.

    All in all, Americans will benefit from the
    internet pharmacies if not through direct
    purchases, then by competitive pressure put
    on the prices down south.

    A.L.

  3. "Al. Lohse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    mfg said:


    http://www.globeandmail.com

    Globe and Mail, Thursday Oct 30, page A 17

    Is Big Pharma Pulling Canada's Chain?
    Alan Cassels

    It's as if there were a sign outside Tunney's Pasture, Health Canada's
    home in Ottawa, that reads, "Gone Fishing." For as pressure mounts
    from American pharmaceutical manufacturers for Canada to stop selling
    our cheaper drugs to Americans via the Internet, Health Canada is
    casting for evidence that the cross-border trade may be causing drug
    shortages here at home.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>>>>>>>> snipped >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    While this has little to do with
    sci.med.cardiology, it may be more relevant
    than the two
    foot-pound-litre-metre-quart-gallon-lightyear-angstrom-lumen
    diet, but not nearly as much fun.

    ************************

    I disagree Al. This has a LOT to do with sci.med.cardiology. It talks
    about the same system that put STATINS on the market. The same system
    which has vowed to "help" Canadians get better healthcare (read: more
    like the United States has) and has pledged $1 million to be spent on
    that effort by the U.S. based pharma umbrella association. So while
    this, in and of itself, is not about your heart or mine A.L. it is
    about the heart of Canada: our healthcare system. More to come on this
    topic.

    As for the rest of your post--I couldn't agree more--hear hear!

    MFG

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.