While its widely accepted that a mid-to-high-end carbon fiber frame is essential for a competitive road bike, Id like to challenge this notion and hear from others who may have differing opinions. Are there any other features that could potentially outweigh the benefits of a high-end frame, such as a top-of-the-line groupset, high-performance wheels, or advanced aerodynamic components? Some bike manufacturers are now offering high-end groupsets and advanced aerodynamic designs on lower-cost frames, which brings up the question: can a rider with a lower budget still compete effectively with a bike that doesnt have a top-tier frame?
Consider the following scenario: a rider has a budget of $2,500 to spend on a road bike and can choose between a high-end aluminum frame with a top-of-the-line groupset and high-performance wheels, or a mid-range carbon fiber frame with a lesser groupset and standard wheels. Which option would be more beneficial for racing and why? Are there any specific features that would make one option significantly better than the other, or would the difference be negligible in real-world racing conditions?
Consider the following scenario: a rider has a budget of $2,500 to spend on a road bike and can choose between a high-end aluminum frame with a top-of-the-line groupset and high-performance wheels, or a mid-range carbon fiber frame with a lesser groupset and standard wheels. Which option would be more beneficial for racing and why? Are there any specific features that would make one option significantly better than the other, or would the difference be negligible in real-world racing conditions?