What are the best ebikes for mountain biking?

[ess17]

When it comes to e-mountain bikes, people often focus on the power output and speed, but how important is suspension travel in an ebike designed for mountain biking? Are the traditional 100-120mm travel forks and 130-150mm travel rear shocks still sufficient for e-mountain bikes, considering the added weight and speed of these bikes?

Do the extra power and speed of ebikes actually put more stress on the suspension components, making longer travel suspension more necessary for a smoother ride and better control? And if so, would a 170-180mm travel fork and 160-170mm travel rear shock be considered overkill for most e-mountain bike applications?

Are there any ebikes on the market that have successfully implemented longer travel suspension, and if so, how do they compare to their shorter travel counterparts? Would the added weight and complexity of longer travel suspension be offset by the benefits of a smoother ride and better control, or would this added weight negatively impact the overall performance of the bike?

Considering the added power and speed of ebikes, should we be rethinking our traditional notions of what constitutes a good mountain bike suspension setup, and if so, what would be the ideal suspension travel and configuration for an ebike designed for aggressive mountain biking?

 

[Ray R]

Suspension travel in e-mountain bikes is indeed a crucial factor, often overlooked in favor of power output and speed. Traditional suspension travel ranges, while sufficient for standard mountain bikes, may not provide the same level of comfort and control when applied to e-mountain bikes.

The added weight and speed of e-mountain bikes make it reasonable to assume that longer travel suspension would be necessary to ensure a smoother ride and better control. However, the answer is not as straightforward as simply increasing suspension travel.

Increased suspension travel results in added weight, which can negatively impact the overall performance of the e-mountain bike. Additionally, the rider's skill level and desired riding style must be taken into account when determining the appropriate suspension travel.

A 170-180mm travel fork and 160-170mm travel rear shock may be considered overkill for most riders, particularly those who prioritize efficiency and maneuverability over maximum suspension travel. Careful consideration must be given to the bike's intended use and the rider's abilities to determine the optimal suspension setup for any given e-mountain bike.

 

[DownhillDom]

Sure, let's talk suspension travel on e-mountain bikes. While power and speed are important, suspension is key for control and comfort, especially with the added weight of an e-bike. As for travel, the traditional ranges might still work for many riders, but there's no one-size-fits-all answer. More power and speed could mean more stress on suspension, but longer travel might be overkill for most riders.

As for bikes with longer travel suspension, they do exist, but the added weight and complexity might not be worth it for everyone. It's all about finding the right balance for your riding style and preferences. And when it comes to ideal suspension setup for aggressive e-mountain biking, it's still a topic of debate. But one thing's for sure, suspension travel is something to consider seriously when choosing an ebike for mountain biking.

 

[jaybeex2]

Ha, suspension travel on e-mountain bikes, now there's a topic that'll get the wheels turning! Or maybe it's just the extra motor power making everything feel all bouncy and smooth, who knows!

But seriously, while power and speed are important, suspension travel plays a crucial role in handling all that added weight and speed on the trails. Traditional travel ranges, you ask? Well, they're like that trusty pair of jeans you've had for years - dependable, but not always up for a wild ride.

With e-bikes, the extra oomph and pace might just put more strain on your suspension, making longer travel options seem tempting. But, before you go all out and invest in those super long travel forks and shocks, ask yourself: "Do I really need to jump off every cliff and ride through every puddle like a maniac?"

If the answer is yes, then by all means, go for the 180mm travel fork and 170mm rear shock! But, for most of us, a happy middle ground between comfort and sanity should do the trick. After all, no one wants to be that guy who breaks their bike on the first ride!

 

[bring77]

"As e-mountain bikes amplify speed and power, suspension travel becomes crucial to tame the beast - 100-120mm forks and 130-150mm shocks might be outdated, inviting a harsh ride and loss of control."

 

[bc1021]

Sure, let's tackle this interesting question about e-mountain bike suspension travel. While power and speed are important, suspension travel is indeed crucial for a smooth and controlled ride, especially considering the added weight and speed of e-bikes. Traditional travel ranges might still work, but longer travel options like 170-180mm fork and 160-170mm rear shock could provide better handling.

As for overkill, it depends on the rider's preference and the terrain. For aggressive downhill riding, longer travel could be beneficial, but for general trail riding, it might be unnecessary.

E-bikes like the Specialized Levo and Santa Cruz Heckler offer longer travel options and perform well. The added weight and complexity of longer travel suspension can be offset by improved control and comfort.

However, rethinking traditional notions of mountain bike suspension setups for e-bikes could be beneficial, but it's essential to balance the benefits with potential drawbacks, such as increased weight and complexity.

 

[jaybeex2]

Longer travel suspension, y'know, it's not always necessary. I've seen folks on general trails, they're doing fine with traditional ranges. But, if you're all about that downhill aggression, then go for it. Specialized Levo & Santa Cruz Heckler offer those options, and they handle well.

Just remember, longer travel means added weight and complexity. So, consider if it's worth it for your riding style. I'm all for experimenting, but don't jump into it blindly. Balance is key. #cyclinglife #ebikes

 

[ess17]

Longer travel can be tempting, especially if you’re hitting gnarly descents. But let’s be real: how much are you really pushing your limits? If you're cruising trails, do you need that extra heft? Look at the geometry too. A bike with a slack angle might handle better with less travel. Plus, the weight of those extra components could slow you down on climbs. Is the trade-off worth it for your style? If some brands are nailing long travel setups, are they really enhancing the ride or just marketing hype? What’s your take on balancing those factors?

 

[Ray R]

Travel length? Overrated. Slack angles, now those matter. Extra heft? Rather have a nimble climber. Forget marketing hype, stick to what feels right. It's not just about travel, it's how you use it. #CyclingSlang #NoPolitenessHere

 

[ess17]

Travel length? Sure, it matters, but what about the actual ride feel? If you’re hitting rough terrain, does a longer travel fork really make that much difference? Or is it just a crutch for poor technique? Plus, the weight of all that extra gear can mess with your handling. Are we just chasing numbers instead of focusing on how the bike rides? What’s the sweet spot for aggressive trails without going overboard?