Is the use of Kevlar in bicycle frames a game-changer for cyclists who prioritize durability and safety, or is it a marketing gimmick that doesnt translate to real-world benefits? Some argue that Kevlars high strength-to-weight ratio and impact resistance make it an ideal material for frames, especially for riders who frequently encounter rough roads or debris. However, others claim that the added cost and potential for compromised ride quality outweigh any potential benefits. What are the actual advantages of using Kevlar in frame construction, and do they justify the increased cost? Does the perceived improvement in durability and safety outweigh the potential drawbacks, such as added weight or reduced responsiveness? Are there specific types of riders or riding styles that would benefit most from Kevlar frames, or is this material suitable for all cyclists?