Road Cycling · Public discussion

What a bunch of dopes!

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 351 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 March 2005
Last activity
13 March 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
351
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    From Velonews:

    Merckx, Van Summeren victim of helmet ruling
    Axel Merckx and Davitamon-Lotto teammate Johan Van Summeren were kicked
    out of Paris-Nice following Friday's climbing stage up Mont Faron after
    the pair took off their helmets on the final climb.

    According to new ProTour rules, riders will not be allowed to remove
    helmets on summit finishes longer than 5km. When the UCI instituted the
    mandatory helmet rule following the tragic death of Andrei Kivilev in
    the 2003 Paris-Nice, riders were still allowed to ride without helmet
    on longer summit finishes.

    That's changed under the ProTour, but many riders evidently were
    confused about the ruling. Riders in other recent races, including the
    Tour of Langkawi, were still allowed to take off helmets, but those
    weren't ProTour events.

    "I didn't realize the rules had changed," said Merckx. "When I got to
    the bottom of the climb, the bus driver was there and I handed him the
    helmet. The horrible thing is that I always wear my helmet, even when I
    am training."

    My question is why did he take off his helmet then? If he wears it all
    the time, why not wear it to the finish? Their argument has been that
    it's too hot, well PN has been cold, so what on earth was his need to
    remove his helmet. I really have no sympathy for these guys because it
    just isn't that bad to weat a helmet.

    CH

  2. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From Velonews:

    Merckx, Van Summeren victim of helmet ruling
    Axel Merckx and Davitamon-Lotto teammate Johan Van Summeren were


    kicked

    Quoted message said:

    out of Paris-Nice following Friday's climbing stage up Mont Faron


    after

    Quoted message said:

    the pair took off their helmets on the final climb.

    According to new ProTour rules, riders will not be allowed to remove
    helmets on summit finishes longer than 5km. When the UCI instituted


    the

    Quoted message said:

    mandatory helmet rule following the tragic death of Andrei Kivilev in
    the 2003 Paris-Nice, riders were still allowed to ride without helmet
    on longer summit finishes.

    That's changed under the ProTour, but many riders evidently were
    confused about the ruling. Riders in other recent races, including


    the

    Quoted message said:

    Tour of Langkawi, were still allowed to take off helmets, but those
    weren't ProTour events.

    "I didn't realize the rules had changed," said Merckx. "When I got to
    the bottom of the climb, the bus driver was there and I handed him


    the

    Quoted message said:

    helmet. The horrible thing is that I always wear my helmet, even when


    I

    Quoted message said:

    am training."

    My question is why did he take off his helmet then? If he wears it


    all

    Quoted message said:

    the time, why not wear it to the finish? Their argument has been


    that

    Quoted message said:

    it's too hot, well PN has been cold, so what on earth was his need to
    remove his helmet. I really have no sympathy for these guys because


    it

    Quoted message said:

    just isn't that bad to weat a helmet.

    CH

    Hi Chris
    My thought when I read this was that the UCI and the officials had
    their heads up their asses. They were told that at Langkawi they could
    toss them, now they get tossed for it. The officiating and rider
    information was screwed.
    Bill C

  3. Quoted message said:

    Why if you wear it all the time would you take it off at the finish on
    a cool day?

    Because the bus driver (actual team bus) said to them while they passed:
    "Gimme your helmet!". In Axel's words, he then didn't think about it, he
    just gave him the helmet.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  4. Bill C said:

    My thought when I read this was that the UCI and the officials had
    their heads up their asses.

    That may be true but this ...

    Quoted message said:

    They were told that at Langkawi they could
    toss them

    .... is not
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2005/jan05/langkawi05/index.php?id=stage8/IMG_8090
    (final 20 kms climb)

    Same in Andalucia, where Merckx rode
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2005/feb05/ruta_del_sol05/ruta_del_sol051/cimg2542
    (7 kms climb)

    Jenko

  5. Bill C said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From Velonews:

    Merckx, Van Summeren victim of helmet ruling
    Axel Merckx and Davitamon-Lotto teammate Johan Van Summeren were
    kicked out of Paris-Nice following Friday's climbing stage up Mont
    Faron after the pair took off their helmets on the final climb.

    According to new ProTour rules, riders will not be allowed to remove
    helmets on summit finishes longer than 5km. When the UCI instituted
    the mandatory helmet rule following the tragic death of Andrei
    Kivilev in the 2003 Paris-Nice, riders were still allowed to ride
    without helmet on longer summit finishes.

    That's changed under the ProTour, but many riders evidently were
    confused about the ruling. Riders in other recent races, including
    the Tour of Langkawi, were still allowed to take off helmets, but
    those weren't ProTour events.

    "I didn't realize the rules had changed," said Merckx. "When I got to
    the bottom of the climb, the bus driver was there and I handed him
    the helmet. The horrible thing is that I always wear my helmet, even
    when I am training."

    My question is why did he take off his helmet then? If he wears it
    all the time, why not wear it to the finish? Their argument has
    been that it's too hot, well PN has been cold, so what on earth was
    his need to remove his helmet. I really have no sympathy for these
    guys because it just isn't that bad to weat a helmet.

    CH

    Hi Chris
    My thought when I read this was that the UCI and the officials had
    their heads up their asses. They were told that at Langkawi they could
    toss them, now they get tossed for it. The officiating and rider
    information was screwed.
    Bill C

    They certainly didn't take there helmets off on the Genting stage of TDL.- I
    was there. :-)
    Jan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.