Whats the deal with hip thrusts being touted as a panacea for cyclists looking to improve their power output and endurance on the bike - are they truly a game-changer or just another overhyped exercise thats been co-opted by the cycling community without a full understanding of their actual benefits and limitations?
It seems like every strength training program for cyclists these days includes hip thrusts as a staple exercise, but Im not convinced that theyre the most effective way to target the specific muscle groups that are most relevant to cycling performance. I mean, arent the glutes and hip flexors already getting plenty of work from the repetitive motion of pedaling, and wouldnt exercises like squats and lunges be more effective at building functional strength that translates to the bike?
And what about the issue of specificity - are hip thrusts really the best way to target the specific range of motion and muscle recruitment patterns that are most relevant to cycling? Or are they just a generic strength exercise thats being shoehorned into cycling training programs without a full understanding of their actual benefits and limitations?
Id love to see some actual data and research on the effectiveness of hip thrusts for cyclists, rather than just anecdotal evidence and hearsay from coaches and trainers who are pushing this exercise as a magic bullet for improved cycling performance. Can anyone point me in the direction of some reputable studies or research papers that explore the role of hip thrusts in cycling training, and how they compare to other exercises like squats, lunges, and deadlifts in terms of building functional strength and power output on the bike?
It seems like every strength training program for cyclists these days includes hip thrusts as a staple exercise, but Im not convinced that theyre the most effective way to target the specific muscle groups that are most relevant to cycling performance. I mean, arent the glutes and hip flexors already getting plenty of work from the repetitive motion of pedaling, and wouldnt exercises like squats and lunges be more effective at building functional strength that translates to the bike?
And what about the issue of specificity - are hip thrusts really the best way to target the specific range of motion and muscle recruitment patterns that are most relevant to cycling? Or are they just a generic strength exercise thats being shoehorned into cycling training programs without a full understanding of their actual benefits and limitations?
Id love to see some actual data and research on the effectiveness of hip thrusts for cyclists, rather than just anecdotal evidence and hearsay from coaches and trainers who are pushing this exercise as a magic bullet for improved cycling performance. Can anyone point me in the direction of some reputable studies or research papers that explore the role of hip thrusts in cycling training, and how they compare to other exercises like squats, lunges, and deadlifts in terms of building functional strength and power output on the bike?