Road Cycling · Public discussion

We another ITT

Started by Keith · · Last activity · 2 posts · 293 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
22 July 2005
Last activity
23 July 2005
Original author
Keith
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
293
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Pretty dumb move to remove that mid-tour ITT like the one we had in
    2003, might have put Ullrich back in the game earlier. Males no sense
    to have climbers in the top ten like this.

  2. "Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Pretty dumb move to remove that mid-tour ITT like the one we had in
    2003, might have put Ullrich back in the game earlier. Males no sense
    to have climbers in the top ten like this.

    The ITT was not exactly "removed"--it was moved to stage 1--technically, the
    prologue was "removed". The first time trial is often modified or moved,
    depending on the overall parcours setup.

    One of the main goals of shortening and moving the ITT (as well as reducing
    the number of moutain top finishes) was to keep the time gaps closer, so
    that the last week would be more interesting and competitive. The
    post-mountain stages were also made more challenging for the same reason.

    If you look at the competition for places 3-10, the Tour organizers have
    succeeded somewhat. As for the lead--the strongest rider asserts himself, no
    matter the course.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.