Power meters · Public discussion

Watts in your tank?

Started by Ergoman · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,340 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
1 August 2007
Last activity
1 August 2007
Original author
Ergoman
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,340
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It has occured to me that a relationship between long term power (let's call it aerobic power) and short term power (the sum of aerobic power plus stored energy power) might simply be given by this equation:

    Pt = Pa + E/t

    Where Pt is the average power output of a rider over any given period of time, Pa is the rider's aerobic power limit, E is the rider's stored energy (watt-min in the tank) and t is time.

    By pluging this equation with data from hard efforts over two different periods of time, and then solving the two simultaneous equations, it's then possible to determine Pt and E. Here's an example for one minute and five minute maximum efforts:

    P1 = 566 watts average over one minute
    P5 = 344 watts average over five minutes

    566 = Pa + E/1
    344 = Pa +E/5

    Solving these equations we determine that Pa for this rider is 288.5 watts, and E is 277.5 watt-minutes. Now, with these two numbers, it's possible to calculate the rider's potential power output over any given period of time. For example, FTP is power over 60 minutes, so for the rider above, FTP would be:

    P60 = 288.5 + 277.5/60 = 293 watts

    I've tested this relationship on my own data and the calculated power over any given time comes very close to what I've actually produced. I would be very curious to know the results others get using their data and this formula.

    If the relationship described by this formula turns out to be valid, then a practical application would be another, shorter and easier test for FTP. Just go hard for one minute, then when rested, go hard for five minutes. Actually any two time intervals could be used, but 1 minute and five minutes are easiest for me and I'd think that intervals of less than about 30 seconds would be to greatly influenced by technique and other physical limitations (you might have the energy in the tank but not the muscles, tendons and bones to take it out more rapidly).

    What do you think?

  2. Ergoman said:

    What do you think?

    You just reinvented the critical power model.

  3. I think using such short durations will skew results and that there arguably is little difference between 1m and 5m power when compared to 60m power.

    My maths stink, so I didn't try to solve the equations, but how do the following #'s fit your idea?
    1m= 580w
    5m= 385w

    Then run it with
    10m= 335w
    15m= 325w

    My guess is that, like Monod, the accuracy of your formula depends on the durations used and the power profile of the individual. If I use 1, 5, 10m in Monod I get 60m= 312w, if I use 5, 10, 15m I get 302w. Not a huge difference, and well within the vagaries of PM measurement and daily performance fluctuations, but a difference nonetheless.

  4. peterpen said:

    My guess is that, like Monod, the accuracy of your formula

    His formula is the Monod formula.

  5. doh! :o
    Well, I did say my maths stink...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.