CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
I thought Jim Carson's recent blog entry regarding his bike was pretty
funny, where he refered to his crank arm as a "warp nacelle".
See: http://www.jimcarson.com/a/2005/11/frame_work.shtml
--
Warm Regards,
Claire Petersky
Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/
See the books I've set free at:
http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky
Impulse power *is* more efficient for commuting.
Group: rec.bicycles.misc Date: Sat, Nov 12, 2005, 1:03am (EST+5) From:
[email hidden] (Claire Petersky)
Quoted message said:I thought Jim Carson's recent blog entry
regarding his bike was pretty funny,
where he refered to his crank arm as a
"warp nacelle".
--
Warm Regards,
Claire Petersky
Why not? I refer to my 48 x 12 as "Hyperdrive"
- -
Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"
"May you have the winds at your back,
And a really low gear for the hills!"
Chris'Z Corner
http://www.geocities.com/czcorner
"Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I thought Jim Carson's recent blog entry regarding his bike was pretty
funny, where he refered to his crank arm as a "warp nacelle".
The speed I cycle at, I'm fairly certain I do not need an inertial damper
;-)
Cheers, helen s
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.