This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 12 November 2005
- Last activity
- 14 November 2005
- Original author
- Claire Petersky
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 391
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
Original postClaire Petersky
Archived post
-
#2
Impulse power *is* more efficient for commuting.
-
#3
"Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I thought Jim Carson's recent blog entry regarding his bike was pretty
funny, where he refered to his crank arm as a "warp nacelle".
See: http://www.jimcarson.com/a/2005/11/frame_work.shtml
The speed I cycle at, I'm fairly certain I do not need an inertial damper
;-)
Cheers, helen s
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
·0 bots
·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.