General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Vitamin Discovery

Started by kathy37 · · Last activity · 2 posts · 433 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
kathy37
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
433
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What is the history of this subject? Was it done over the
    years? Was it done by one researcher or several? When was
    the "last" vitamin "discovered" & which one was it? Will
    there be more?

  2. [email hidden] wrote in news:5290-4083FDF3-490@storefull-
    3135.bay.webtv.net:

    Quoted message said:


    What is the history of this subject? Was it done over the
    years? Was it done by one researcher or several? When was
    the "last" vitamin "discovered" & which one was it? Will
    there be more?

    It's a long and fascinating history. Any good biochemistry
    text should give the details. The discoveries took place
    over several decades (mostly from 1910, when thiamine was
    discovered, to 1948, when B12 was discovered), with
    different researchers working independently. The substance
    most recently classified as a vitamin was pyrroloquinoline
    quinone, which was discovered in 1979 but only classified as
    a vitamin last year (it's not yet known if there are any
    *human* deficiency diseases caused by lack of it, but it
    plays a biochemical role similar to that of niacin and
    riboflavin).

    Incidentally, the discovery of niacin had a lot of political
    implications; Joseph Goldberger proved that the disease
    pellagra, endemic among poor people in the American South,
    was the result of a deficient diet rather than bad genes.
    This was at the height of the eugenics movement and the
    discovery was a major blow to the eugenicists because it
    showed that one of the problems of the poor could be
    eliminated by spending more money on them rather than by
    stopping them from breeding. Nature, it seems, isn't always
    as "politically incorrect" as the eugenicists and
    sociobiologists would have you think. Oh, and the
    eugenicists, when mentioning Goldberger's name in sneering
    tones, would always put an extraordinary amount of emphasis
    on its first syllable.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.