I have a Trek 1500 with a 53 X 39 double with a 12 X 26 nine speed casette. The front derailler is a 105 double, rear is ultegra, shifters are 105.
While in the big ring I can only use the 4-5 smallest cogs in the rear without chain rub. While in the smaller front ring, I can use the seven largest cogs with no problem and, if riding easy, eight of the nine. Does this seem normal? It leaves me with no overlap between the two rings.
I have a Trek 1500 with a 53 X 39 double with a 12 X 26 nine speed casette. The front derailler is a 105 double, rear is ultegra, shifters are 105.
While in the big ring I can only use the 4-5 smallest cogs in the rear without chain rub. While in the smaller front ring, I can use the seven largest cogs with no problem and, if riding easy, eight of the nine. Does this seem normal? It leaves me with no overlap between the two rings.
Dave
Check if your outer chainring limit screw on the front derailleur is allowing the front derailleur cage to go too far out, towards the crank arm. Your gap between the outside side of the chain and the outer plate of the front derailleur cage may be too large. Check when the chain is on the outer chainring and the smallest cog in back. If so then when you are shifted onto the large chainring, you have less space in between the front derailleur plates to allow the chain to move over the rear cogs.
Your front derailleur inner limit screw is probably correct. It is set so there is barely any space between the inside side of the chain and the inner front derailleur plate when in the largest cog in back and small chainring in front. So you have the full space between the front derailleur plates to allow the chain to move over lots of cogs before rubbing.
While in the big ring I can only use the 4-5 smallest cogs in the rear without chain rub. While in the smaller front ring, I can use the seven largest cogs with no problem and, if riding easy, eight of the nine. Does this seem normal? It leaves me with no overlap between the two rings.
The inner ring seems normal. the small-small combinations tend to get chain rub on the inside of the big ring, so you should avoid those. But on the big ring you should be able to use all but the biggest sprocket in back. Sounds like the front derailleur is too far out. I don't suppose your shifter has "trim" adjustments -- click a little and move it a bit to not run on the chain. If not, you need to take more time getting the front adjusted. IMO this is a slight problem with Shimano shifters. Campy has lots of trim adjustment; only the higher-priced Shimano do.
--
David L. Johnson
__o | When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember _`\(,_ | that your initial objective was to drain the swamp. -- LBJ (_)/ (_) |
While in the big ring I can only use the 4-5 smallest cogs in the rear without chain rub. While in the smaller front ring, I can use the seven largest cogs with no problem and, if riding easy, eight of the nine. Does this seem normal? It leaves me with no overlap between the two rings.
The inner ring seems normal. the small-small combinations tend to get chain rub on the inside of the big ring, so you should avoid those. But on the big ring you should be able to use all but the biggest sprocket in back. Sounds like the front derailleur is too far out. I don't suppose your shifter has "trim" adjustments -- click a little and move it a bit to not run on the chain. If not, you need to take more time getting the front adjusted. IMO this is a slight problem with Shimano shifters. Campy has lots of trim adjustment; only the higher-priced Shimano do.
_ I don't know about his 105 brifters, but mine have one "click" of trim available if you look for it. It takes a bit of practice, since it's easy to overclick and end up shifting. If you didn't know or expect it to be there you might realize that it was available to use.