Urgent: Do the Time Out Survey



T

Tony Raven

Guest
Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a platform
for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying could easily
give them a result they didn't expect - especially as the survey has
been off-line for several days. So do it now!!
http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey


--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a
> platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying
> could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as
> the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!!
> http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey


Already done it. You might want to notify the C+ forum for more strength in
numbers.
 
Simon Bennett wrote on 14/07/2006 13:21 +0100:
> Tony Raven wrote:
>> Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a
>> platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying
>> could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as
>> the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!!
>> http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey

>
> Already done it. You might want to notify the C+ forum for more strength in
> numbers.
>


I'm not a member so can't post but if anyone is and can.....


--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
Tony Raven said:
Simon Bennett wrote on 14/07/2006 13:21 +0100:
> Tony Raven wrote:
>> Do the survey before it closes today. I know it sounds like a
>> platform for the usual lycra lout rant but lots of cyclists replying
>> could easily give them a result they didn't expect - especially as
>> the survey has been off-line for several days. So do it now!!
>> http://www.timeout.com/competition/cyclingsurvey

>
> Already done it. You might want to notify the C+ forum for more strength in
> numbers.
>


I'm not a member so can't post but if anyone is and can.....


--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci

Posted in the campaign section (wasn't too sure where to post it).

Bryan
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> Do the survey before it closes today.


> So do it now!!


But I don't live in London!

--

JimP

" " - John Cage
 
Jim Price wrote on 14/07/2006 23:14 +0100:
> Tony Raven wrote:
>> Do the survey before it closes today.

>
>> So do it now!!

>
> But I don't live in London!
>


Neither do I. Still filled it in.

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
Jim Price wrote on 14/07/2006 23:14 +0100:
>>But I don't live in London!


and Tony Raven responded:
> Neither do I. Still filled it in.


I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no further.

--
Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
 
Danny Colyer wrote on 15/07/2006 09:34 +0100:
> Jim Price wrote on 14/07/2006 23:14 +0100:
>>> But I don't live in London!

>
> and Tony Raven responded:
>> Neither do I. Still filled it in.

>
> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no further.
>


You are an honest man Mr Colyer.

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
in message <[email protected]>, Tony Raven
('[email protected]') wrote:

> Danny Colyer wrote on 15/07/2006 09:34 +0100:
>> Jim Price wrote on 14/07/2006 23:14 +0100:
>>>> But I don't live in London!

>>
>> and Tony Raven responded:
>>> Neither do I. Still filled it in.

>>
>> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no
>> further.

>
> You are an honest man Mr Colyer.


In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

;; All in all you're just another hick in the mall
-- Drink C'lloid
 
Simon Brooke wrote on 15/07/2006 12:25 +0100:
>>> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no
>>> further.

>> You are an honest man Mr Colyer.

>
> In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.
>


So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I
don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if
I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote on 15/07/2006 12:25 +0100:
>>>> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no
>>>> further.
>>> You are an honest man Mr Colyer.

>>
>> In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.
>>

>
> So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I
> don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if
> I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)
>

One of the things I hated about London was being asked to participate in
surveys. The Golgafrinchans use the results to make what you want cost
you more.

--

JimP

" " - John Cage
 
In article <[email protected]>, Tony Raven wrote:
>Simon Brooke wrote on 15/07/2006 12:25 +0100:
>>>> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no
>>>> further.
>>> You are an honest man Mr Colyer.

>>
>> In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.

>
>So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I
>don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if
>I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)


And not because you have to go to London for work? Oh well, takes all sorts.
(I looked at it, thought "I don't work/live/cycle in London", and closed it.)
 
Simon Brooke wrote:
> in message <[email protected]>, Tony Raven
> ('[email protected]') wrote:
>
>> Danny Colyer wrote on 15/07/2006 09:34 +0100:
>>> Jim Price wrote on 14/07/2006 23:14 +0100:
>>>>> But I don't live in London!
>>>
>>> and Tony Raven responded:
>>>> Neither do I. Still filled it in.
>>>
>>> I got as far as "Whereabouts in London do you work" and went no
>>> further.

>>
>> You are an honest man Mr Colyer.

>
> In that case, I am, too, because I had the same reaction.


I left that bit blank and filled the rest in. I find myself on a bike in
London for 2 or 3 hours a year, which I suspect is above the mean for
Londoners, and definitely above the median, so I feel justified in writing.

A
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that I
> don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey if
> I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)


Last time I visited London was 5 years ago, test riding recumbents.
Last time I cycled there other than test riding recumbents was 2 or 3
years before that, and I've only cycled in London 2 or 3 times.
Probably best that I didn't continue, then.

--
Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
 
Danny Colyer wrote on 16/07/2006 00:30 +0100:
> Tony Raven wrote:
>> So you never cycle in London which is how I justify it. The fact that
>> I don't work there should not stop me contributing to a cycling survey
>> if I cycle there (at least twice a week and four times this week)

>
> Last time I visited London was 5 years ago, test riding recumbents. Last
> time I cycled there other than test riding recumbents was 2 or 3 years
> before that, and I've only cycled in London 2 or 3 times. Probably best
> that I didn't continue, then.
>


I filled it in primarily to try to subvert the obvious attempt to get a
news story that says "Our survey says that cyclists are homicidal
pavement cycling red light jumping law disregarding lycra louts" which
seemed to be the thrust of the questions.

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
In article <[email protected]>, Tony Raven
<[email protected]> writes

>I filled it in primarily to try to subvert the obvious attempt to get a
>news story that says "Our survey says that cyclists are homicidal
>pavement cycling red light jumping law disregarding lycra louts" which
>seemed to be the thrust of the questions.


I doubt though that many of those who cycle on pavements, jump red
lights or otherwise disregard the law would have admitted the fact.

I completed it but wasn't comfortable with the general trend of the
questionnaire.

--
congokid
Eating out in London? Read my tips...
http://congokid.com
 
congokid wrote on 16/07/2006 13:27 +0100:
> In article <[email protected]>, Tony Raven
> <[email protected]> writes
>
>> I filled it in primarily to try to subvert the obvious attempt to get
>> a news story that says "Our survey says that cyclists are homicidal
>> pavement cycling red light jumping law disregarding lycra louts"
>> which seemed to be the thrust of the questions.

>
> I doubt though that many of those who cycle on pavements, jump red
> lights or otherwise disregard the law would have admitted the fact.
>
> I completed it but wasn't comfortable with the general trend of the
> questionnaire.
>


But it was mainly aimed at motorists and pedestrians from the questions
posed and it was to counterbalance them, not other cyclists......never
mind its closed now.

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
In stitches at Tony Raven. Well done Tony - anyone who makes marketers
tear their hair out by skewing their skewed 'surveys', gets my
congratulations. Whenever surveyed by such sharks, online, in the
street, or on paper, I lie automatically, convincingly and proudly.
Whoever composed their survey had not the slightest intention of coming
to representative conclusions on cycling in London, so it would be
positively naive to be honest when filling it in. In my experience they
may well add a random 'correction' to make up for the fact that the
responses don't match what the marketing department/journalist is
promoting/assuming.The resulting article is bound to be more than
irritating.

For those who usenet via google groups and missed the other Time Out
survey thread - see my comments on their reasoning
here:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/2ac8e87699424dac?hl=en&
'View entire thread' clickable.

Hopefully, some cyclist from the ngp or elsewhere has added to their
self-induced despair by emailing them to complain about the slant of
the survey and (most importantly), promising never to buy Time Out
again. Marketers estimate that 'for one person who bothers to write in,
1000* are of the same opinion'.

*Random big-numberism


>>>> But I don't live in London!


>> and Tony Raven responded:
>>> Neither do I. Still filled it in.