I've returned to cycling after a few years off and dug out my Cannondale R500 I got 6 years ago (CAAD2 frame). I probably did about 5,000 miles on it during the time I was regularly cycling.
Its still a nice bike to ride but I fancy changing/upgrading.
Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?
Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?
Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope for improvement!
in message <4187dda4.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable
(') said:
Steve Bullimore said:
Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?
Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope for improvement!
I'd second this. Cannondale frames have always been works of art right back from the beginning. According to Weight Weenies a 2000 CAAD3 in 58cm size weighed in at 1452 grammes (frame only), whereas a 2002 CAAD5 in 56cm size weighed 1415 grammes (including headset) and a 2003 CAAD7 in 56cm size weighed 1294 grammes (without headset). Given that a 58cm frame is inevitably a little heavier than a 56cm it doesn't seem from that that there is any great difference in the weight.
Frankly if there is a hundred grammes difference you could save that by changing your pedals or your saddle. In my opinion you'd be mad to scrap a classic - but if you want to, scrap it my way.
Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
in message <4187dda4.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable
(') said:
Steve Bullimore said:
Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?
Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope for improvement!
I'd second this. Cannondale frames have always been works of art right back from the beginning. According to Weight Weenies a 2000 CAAD3 in 58cm size weighed in at 1452 grammes (frame only), whereas a 2002 CAAD5 in 56cm size weighed 1415 grammes (including headset) and a 2003 CAAD7 in 56cm size weighed 1294 grammes (without headset). Given that a 58cm frame is inevitably a little heavier than a 56cm it doesn't seem from that that there is any great difference in the weight.
Frankly if there is a hundred grammes difference you could save that by changing your pedals or your saddle. In my opinion you'd be mad to scrap a classic - but if you want to, scrap it my way.
Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
in message <4187dda4.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable
(') said:
Steve Bullimore said:
Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?
Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope for improvement!
I'd second this. Cannondale frames have always been works of art right back from the beginning. According to Weight Weenies a 2000 CAAD3 in 58cm size weighed in at 1452 grammes (frame only), whereas a 2002 CAAD5 in 56cm size weighed 1415 grammes (including headset) and a 2003 CAAD7 in 56cm size weighed 1294 grammes (without headset). Given that a 58cm frame is inevitably a little heavier than a 56cm it doesn't seem from that that there is any great difference in the weight.
Frankly if there is a hundred grammes difference you could save that by changing your pedals or your saddle. In my opinion you'd be mad to scrap a classic - but if you want to, scrap it my way.
I've decided to keep it and upgrade. The first thing to go on are some Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheels. To be followed by a new seat, shorter stem (After some long overdue analysis of my riding position my seat needs moving back a bit and so do the bars) and then a good service.