UK and Europe · Public discussion

Upgrading from 1998 Cannondale R500

Started by Steve Bullimore · · Last activity · 5 posts · 2,520 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
2 November 2004
Last activity
5 November 2004
Original author
Steve Bullimore
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,520
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi

    I've returned to cycling after a few years off and dug out my
    Cannondale R500 I got 6 years ago (CAAD2 frame). I probably did about
    5,000 miles on it during the time I was regularly cycling.

    Its still a nice bike to ride but I fancy changing/upgrading.

    Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old
    CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be
    much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?

    cheers,

    Steve.

  2. Steve Bullimore said:

    Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old
    CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be
    much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?

    Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them up,
    but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope for
    improvement!

  3. in message <4187dda4.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable

    (') said:
    Steve Bullimore said:

    Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old
    CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be
    much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?

    Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them
    up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope
    for improvement!

    I'd second this. Cannondale frames have always been works of art right
    back from the beginning. According to Weight Weenies a 2000 CAAD3 in
    58cm size weighed in at 1452 grammes (frame only), whereas a 2002 CAAD5
    in 56cm size weighed 1415 grammes (including headset) and a 2003 CAAD7
    in 56cm size weighed 1294 grammes (without headset). Given that a 58cm
    frame is inevitably a little heavier than a 56cm it doesn't seem from
    that that there is any great difference in the weight.

    Frankly if there is a hundred grammes difference you could save that by
    changing your pedals or your saddle. In my opinion you'd be mad to
    scrap a classic - but if you want to, scrap it my way.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; all in all you're just another click in the call
    ;; -- Minke Bouyed

  4. Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <4187dda4.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable

    (') said:
    Steve Bullimore said:

    Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old
    CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be
    much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?

    Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them
    up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope
    for improvement!

    I'd second this. Cannondale frames have always been works of art right
    back from the beginning. According to Weight Weenies a 2000 CAAD3 in
    58cm size weighed in at 1452 grammes (frame only), whereas a 2002 CAAD5
    in 56cm size weighed 1415 grammes (including headset) and a 2003 CAAD7
    in 56cm size weighed 1294 grammes (without headset). Given that a 58cm
    frame is inevitably a little heavier than a 56cm it doesn't seem from
    that that there is any great difference in the weight.

    Frankly if there is a hundred grammes difference you could save that by
    changing your pedals or your saddle. In my opinion you'd be mad to
    scrap a classic - but if you want to, scrap it my way.

    no look at
    www.alexander-schmidt.de

  5. Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <4187dda4.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable

    (') said:
    Steve Bullimore said:

    Are the newer Cannondale frames much better/lighter than the old
    CAAD2. For instance, would buying a new 2005 R500 with CAAD5 frame be
    much different to my 1998 R500 CAAD2 bike?

    Incredibly unlikely. If you're interested in the weights, look them
    up, but as my 1993 'Dale MTB frame weighs 3lb there's not much scope
    for improvement!

    I'd second this. Cannondale frames have always been works of art right
    back from the beginning. According to Weight Weenies a 2000 CAAD3 in
    58cm size weighed in at 1452 grammes (frame only), whereas a 2002 CAAD5
    in 56cm size weighed 1415 grammes (including headset) and a 2003 CAAD7
    in 56cm size weighed 1294 grammes (without headset). Given that a 58cm
    frame is inevitably a little heavier than a 56cm it doesn't seem from
    that that there is any great difference in the weight.

    Frankly if there is a hundred grammes difference you could save that by
    changing your pedals or your saddle. In my opinion you'd be mad to
    scrap a classic - but if you want to, scrap it my way.

    I've decided to keep it and upgrade. The first thing to go on are some
    Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheels. To be followed by a new seat, shorter stem
    (After some long overdue analysis of my riding position my seat needs
    moving back a bit and so do the bars) and then a good service.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.