General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

undertrained half marathon report

Started by Ronald H. Nicholson Jr. · · Last activity · 2 posts · 269 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 November 2004
Last activity
4 November 2004
Original author
Ronald H. Nicholson Jr.
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
269
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The Silicon Valley half maration Sunday was my first run over 12k.

    According to most running books, I certainly wasn't in condition for
    running a half marathon. I'd only been averaging about 12-15 miles per
    week of running over the last four months, including no single run of
    over 12k.

    But the course closure limit for the Silicon Valley marathon was listed
    on their web site as at a 15 min/mile pace. I can walk at that pace.
    I also get in a bit of mild cross training, mostly ballroom and swing
    dancing, but also an occasional long hike of 10 miles or more, so the
    distance wasn't a worry for me.

    I didn't actually decide to run the half marathon until the afternoon
    before the race. The race was nearby; the weather report was good;
    and my legs felt fresh, so I went down to the expo and went in to see
    if they took late registrations. The first problem was even finding
    late registration. The nice volunteers at the half marathon packet
    pick up table had no idea if or where there was anyone taking late
    registrations. So I just walked around looking until I finally found a
    pile of entry forms. Then just a bit farther down I found an unmarked
    table where there appeared to be someone collecting forms and money.
    The lady took my form and my money, and then told me they were all out
    of timing chips and race numbers. She then gave me a 5k number, with the
    "5k" inked-out and "1/2" hand-written underneath it. Seems they had
    several hundred last minute registrations.

    The next problem was figuring out a target pace, since I had never run
    more than 12k continuously, and none of the pace calculators take (too low
    a) training distance as a variable. But I had to start out at some pace
    (walking or running). So I used the following wild guestimate method.
    According to my training logs, I was actually in slightly better
    shape than in a few previous years where I had run the San Francisco
    Bay-to-Breakers 12k at 9 min/mile pace or better. Based on that,
    I estimated that I could now run more than 12k, maybe up to 9 miles,
    at around 9 min/mile pace, and maybe walk the rest of the 13.1 miles
    at hopefully a 15 min/mile pace. Working the math, that adds up to
    somewhere around a 2:20 half. So I decided to try starting at an even
    pace for that same time goal, about an 11 min/mile pace.

    I lined up approximately 3/4th of the way back in the pack at the
    starting line since previous race results indicated that some percentage
    or participants walked the event. For the first mile or so, I stayed
    with the people around me, but then people started passing me. So I
    guess I should have lined up even further back in the pack. But in
    any case, the first 3 miles took 32:30. After that my legs warmed up,
    the cadence I was most comfortable running at went up from around 162
    ff/min to 172 ff/min, and I had to start inserting walking breaks to
    slow down to my scheduled pace. I think I took about 6 walking breaks
    of one or so minutes between miles 3 and 8 (mostly around water stops).
    I passed the mile 8 marker at 87 minutes by my watch, nearly on target.

    After 8 miles, I realized that the distance remaining was less than
    some training runs from prior weeks, so I started picking up the pace
    to whatever felt natural. After mile 10, I increased my cadence to 180
    ff/min and ran an 8:20 mile; that was too fast. But even after I slowed
    back down a bit (but trying to keep my cadence up) I was still passing
    runners in bursts all the way to the finish. 2:11:50 line-to-line by
    my watch (no chip time, since they were out of chips, and I forgot to
    look at the official clock, I was so busy fiddling with my watch.).
    Ahead of my estimate, but probably a bit too much of a negative split
    for it to have been an optimal time, even for my low training mileage.
    In hindsight, I might have been able to omit most of the walking breaks.

    Since I would be running longer than 90 minutes total, I tried some
    Accelerade at a couple of the aid stations. Seemed to taste OK.
    Couldn't figure out what to do with the gel pack they were handing out
    at one water stop. I also tried drinking while running through the last
    couple water stops, but mostly spilled everything and almost choked once.
    So I guess that that's a skill that has to be practiced.

    I didn't do a sweats check, since I wasn't sure how it worked. But it
    seemed to be well organized, with bags and helpful volunteers at both
    the drop-off and pickup.

    I set my Fitsense watch/pod for the slowest calibration value I had,
    and the distance it reported was accurate within about 1 percent when
    compared to the mile markers for the first 8 miles. But once I picked
    up my cadence and pace it was much farther off. It only registered
    12.9 miles at the finish. I think these accelerometer watches really need
    to be able to take multiple pace-dependant calibration value settings.
    The Fitsense takes only two, "walk" and "run".

    My one complaint about this race was the transportation back for the
    people doing the half. The full marathon was an out and back course.
    The half ended at the far end of the "out". The event brochure said
    there would be buses back, but there certainly weren't enough buses,
    and there was no line control when a bus showed up, just runners who
    had been standing waiting too long trying to crowd in whenever a bus
    finally came and the door opened.

    My legs felt a bit tired, but I still went out social dancing for about
    an hour the evening after the race.

    IMHO. YMMV.
    --
    Ron Nicholson rhn AT nicholson DOT com http://www.nicholson.com/rhn/
    #include <canonical.disclaimer> // only my own opinions, etc.

  2. On 2004-11-04, Ronald H. Nicholson Jr. <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [snip report]

    Congrats on the race.

    One of the reasons I advocate racing, especially for those with less
    experience, is that you never really know what you're capable of until
    you get out there and give it a shot. Overdistance races are also a good
    idea if you approach them in the right way (as I think you did). They
    are good confidence builders for shorter races -- your perspective on a 10k
    changes if you know you can finish a half-marathon, because if you can finish
    a half marathon, then you can really *race* a 10k, and a 5k seems almost
    like a sprint.

    Most of the distance doodads, including fitsense and GPS units are good
    enough for logging milage with reasonable accuracy, but I wouldn't count on
    them to reliably "certify" a route, or determine ones average pace to a
    high level of accuracy. I use my fitsense unit to get a reasonable
    approximation of distance, but I suspect that after a few training runs on
    a given route, my own estimate would be as good as most of the doodads.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.