Road Cycling · Public discussion

Underarmor vs Zyflex

Started by Badger South · · Last activity · 3 posts · 4,762 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 January 2004
Last activity
2 January 2004
Original author
Badger South
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,762
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Nice review on a new type of sport/thermal garment called "Zyflex" in
    Backpacker magazine:

    backpacker.com0,1023,2326,00.html

    They have a new site, plus another site for selling the clothes:

    zyflex.comproductDetail.asp

    The composition is 82% Polyester, 18% Dupont Lycra® Spandex

    Some people mentioned 'Underarmor' a couple weeks ago. I had a chance to look at some of their stuff
    in a local store.

    On their site, they talk about "Turf Gear" as being reinforced, and designed to withstand falling on
    artificial turf. I thought that might be the type to get. However, the shirts I saw at the store
    last weak with this label, looked rather flimsy, and thin and were not obviously reinforced on the
    sleeves. They say it's durable, but it didn't look it.

    However I did get a look at the Cold Weather Gear "Kipper Zip", and it does seem less flimsy, more
    durable, and liked it so much I bought a shirt.

    underarmour.comdetail.asp

    The composition is "100% waffle weave microfiber", whatever that is. I've been unable to find an
    actual name of the fiber, but suspect it's a type of polyester.

    Just wondering if anyone has tried the Zyflex, which appears to be a competing type of material.

    -B

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,=20 [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    =20
    Nice review on a new type of sport/thermal garment called "Zyflex" in Backpacker magazine:
    =20
    backpacker.com0,1023,2326,00.html
    =20
    They have a new site, plus another site for selling the clothes:
    =20
    zyflex.comproductDetail.asp
    =20
    The composition is 82% Polyester, 18% Dupont Lycra=AE Spandex=20
    =20
    Some people mentioned 'Underarmor' a couple weeks ago. I had a chance to look at some of their
    stuff in a local store.
    =20
    On their site, they talk about "Turf Gear" as being reinforced, and designed to withstand falling
    on artificial turf. I thought that might be the type to get. However, the shirts I saw at the
    store last weak with this label, looked rather flimsy, and thin and were not obviously reinforced
    on the sleeves. They say it's durable, but it didn't look it.
    =20
    However I did get a look at the Cold Weather Gear "Kipper Zip", and it does seem less flimsy, more
    durable, and liked it so much I bought a shirt.

    I own a couple of Cold Gear items, and really like them. However, I=20 don't think they would
    survive many falls onto artificial turf. I=20 have also looked at the turf gear, it it appears to me
    that it's=20 designed to be slick to protect you from the turf. I didn't see any=20 reinforcement,
    nor have I seen anything claim it was.

    ....

    --=20 Dave Kerber Fight spam: remove the ns_ from the return address before replying!

    REAL programmers write self-modifying code.

  3. On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 08:22:21 -0500, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:
    Quoted message said:


    However I did get a look at the Cold Weather Gear "Kipper Zip", and it does seem less flimsy,
    more durable, and liked it so much I bought a shirt.

    I own a couple of Cold Gear items, and really like them. However, I don't think they would survive
    many falls onto artificial turf. I have also looked at the turf gear, it it appears to me that it's
    designed to be slick to protect you from the turf. I didn't see any reinforcement, nor have I seen
    anything claim it was.

    Right, I didn't mean to imply there were such claims, I made a presumption - my bad. But sounds like
    you hit on it, it's the 'slickness' that lets you slide on the turf, I'm betting.

    The thing about the Zyflex, according to that one review is that it seems to be very durable. I
    think that would slant me towards that over the UA gear.

    Thanks for the comments!

    -B

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.