After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.
After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.
*boggle*
I particularly like the safety aspect of having a large plastic jerry can of jet fuel about 12" from my crotch while I'm sitting right in front of a jet engine.
-- Dane Buson - [email hidden] Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally. -- Abraham Lincoln
After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.
For the cost of those two engines, you could buy a more-than-decent real motorcycle that would get better fuel economy and provide a higher top speed.
-- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.
For the cost of those two engines, you could buy a more-than-decent real motorcycle that would get better fuel economy and provide a higher top speed.
Yeah, but that would be practical.
You can also apparently get a turbine powered motorcycle: