Road Cycling · Public discussion

Ultimate commuter bike?

Started by Peter Cole · · Last activity · 4 posts · 421 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 May 2006
Last activity
12 May 2006
Original author
Peter Cole
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
421
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5437209871684663077&q=turbine+bike>

    After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end
    of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of
    course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full
    speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.

  2. Peter Cole said:

    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5437209871684663077&q=turbine+bike>

    After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end
    of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of
    course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full
    speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.

    *boggle*

    I particularly like the safety aspect of having a large plastic jerry
    can of jet fuel about 12" from my crotch while I'm sitting right in
    front of a jet engine.

    --
    Dane Buson - [email hidden]
    Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to
    see it tried on him personally.
    -- Abraham Lincoln

  3. Peter Cole said:

    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5437209871684663077&q=turbine+bike>

    After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end
    of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of
    course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full
    speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.

    For the cost of those two engines, you could buy a more-than-decent
    real motorcycle that would get better fuel economy and provide a
    higher top speed.

    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. Werehatrack said:
    Peter Cole said:

    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5437209871684663077&q=turbine+bike>

    After doing a little web-surfing, it seems like you could get a top-end
    of around 70 mph with the most powerful version of these jet motors. Of
    course the kit would set you back $5,000US, and an hour of cruising full
    speed would consume about 12gal of jet fuel.

    For the cost of those two engines, you could buy a more-than-decent
    real motorcycle that would get better fuel economy and provide a
    higher top speed.

    Yeah, but that would be practical.

    You can also apparently get a turbine powered motorcycle:

    <http://www.marineturbine.com/motorsports.asp>
    <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1517213257877491573&q=jay+leno+turbine>

    A bit more expensive, though ($150,000US).

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.