Road Cycling · Public discussion

UCI and France at odds on Doping

Started by Clovis Lark · · Last activity · 3 posts · 740 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 April 2003
Last activity
2 May 2003
Original author
Clovis Lark
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
740
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Galdeano has been KO'd from Le Grand Boucle for a failed test last year which was deemed NOT a
    violation by UCI regulations since he had a valid MD's prescription (asthma). The god Baal (*we live
    in apololyptic times these dayz*) is quoted in the following excerpt from cyclingnews:

    Daniel Baal, the director of the A.S.O., the company that organises the Tour, was quoted by AFP as
    saying "Our position is the same as it was last July: We regret finding ourselves confronted by a
    quarrel of experts, between the decisions of the UCI, which considers there is no doping, and the
    CPDL, which thinks the opposite."

    Baal also called for the unification of anti-doping policy under the World Anti-Doping Agency. "This
    matter illustrates exactly what we deplore: the difference between the what rules of the UCI allow
    and what that of a national federation, in this case France, allows."

  2. Clovis Lark said:

    Baal also called for the unification of anti-doping policy under the World Anti-Doping Agency.
    "This matter illustrates exactly what we deplore: the difference between the what rules of the UCI
    allow and what that of a national federation, in this case France, allows."

    The solution is simple. UCI should stop sanctioning events in france until those hypocrite idiots
    conform themselves to what the rest of the world does. I am fed up of those [censored] saying they are not
    like other countries. If they really are, they should face the consequence of being isolated.

  3. Davide Tosi said:

    Clovis Lark <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Baal also called for the unification of anti-doping policy under the World Anti-Doping Agency.
    "This matter illustrates exactly what we deplore: the difference between the what rules of the UCI
    allow and what that of a national federation, in this case France, allows."

    Quoted message said:

    The solution is simple. UCI should stop sanctioning events in france until those hypocrite idiots
    conform themselves to what the rest of the world does.

    OK, in dopage, a valid point. I believe they conform with the US, however, in letting their own
    folks handle this stuff.

    Quoted message said:

    I am fed up of those [censored] saying they are not like other countries. If they really are, they
    should face the consequence of being isolated.

    Who is isolated? Perhaps you should conpare the list of the coalition of the willing with that of
    the UNwilling. It would seem that the USA has aligned itself with those countries whose immigrants
    it routinely harrasses...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.