Road Cycling · Public discussion

UCI and ASO at odds

Started by Richard Adams · · Last activity · 2 posts · 371 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 July 2004
Last activity
16 July 2004
Original author
Richard Adams
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
371
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/news/articles/6586.0.html

    Seems the ASO feels much more strongly the need to toss riders who are
    guilty until proven innocent than the UCI does.

    I read elsewhere (possibly in an rbr post) this morning that Padrnos
    and Zanini were being called as a formality to close the books on the
    investigation. Seems "we're not charging then with anything and it's
    just a hearing" to the ASO still justifies booting riders.

    Anyone got a feeling who's really behind the push at the ASO for their
    position?

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Richard Adams) said:

    http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/news/articles/6586.0.html

    Seems the ASO feels much more strongly the need to toss riders who are
    guilty until proven innocent than the UCI does.

    I read elsewhere (possibly in an rbr post) this morning that Padrnos
    and Zanini were being called as a formality to close the books on the
    investigation. Seems "we're not charging then with anything and it's
    just a hearing" to the ASO still justifies booting riders.

    Anyone got a feeling who's really behind the push at the ASO for their
    position?

    Maybe Lafferty.

    --
    Remove _me_ for e-mail address

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.