Seems the ASO feels much more strongly the need to toss riders who are guilty until proven innocent than the UCI does.
I read elsewhere (possibly in an rbr post) this morning that Padrnos and Zanini were being called as a formality to close the books on the investigation. Seems "we're not charging then with anything and it's just a hearing" to the ASO still justifies booting riders.
Anyone got a feeling who's really behind the push at the ASO for their position?
Seems the ASO feels much more strongly the need to toss riders who are guilty until proven innocent than the UCI does.
I read elsewhere (possibly in an rbr post) this morning that Padrnos and Zanini were being called as a formality to close the books on the investigation. Seems "we're not charging then with anything and it's just a hearing" to the ASO still justifies booting riders.
Anyone got a feeling who's really behind the push at the ASO for their position?