[email hidden] wrote
Quoted message said:I am a 'Mountain Bike innocent' Dad who wants to present his son with a pair of MTB tyres as a
surprise birthday present.
I had almost satisfied myself that a pair of IRC Kujo DH 26 x 2.25 would be acceptable to him.
DH means "downhill". This means that they are quite likely to be very heavy, which is great for
going downhill, but not great for going uphill!
Quoted message said:However, I have now noticed that his present front tyre is 26 x 2.1. Does this mean that 2.25 will
not do ?
Depends on both the clearance and what he wants to do with the bike. The
2.25" tire may fit in the frame but not leave any mud clearance. And, again, if he's not primarily a
downhiller a tire more suitable for cross-country use would be better. The Panaracer Trail Blaster
and Fire XC Pro have gotten good reviews as excellent all-round tires. If you get him the version
with the Kevlar bead it'll be lighter than the wire bead, and so make the wheels just that little
bit easier to turn around. If possible, get it in a color that goes with his bike. 2.1" width is a
good width for general cross country riding, although if he encounters alot of mud, or does
racing, he might prefer a narrower version.
Quoted message said:Are front and back wheels necessarily the same size ?
The wheels are highly likely to be the same size, but it's often the case that people use different
widths of tires front and back (e.g. my Marin has less frame clearance in back so I use a 1.9" tire
in back but 2.1" in front).
-Myra