Tyler

"lazysegall" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I know there are some technical problems with his doping case. Can
someone explain? or give me an article that explains it well. I guess
some of this is speculation, but I guess that is welcomed. I know that
this will turn into a troll thread about doping, but oh well i guess.

Any day now...

He's an innocent man.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I know there are some technical problems with his doping case. Can
someone explain? or give me an article that explains it well. I guess
some of this is speculation, but I guess that is welcomed. I know that
this will turn into a troll thread about doping, but oh well i guess.

Any day now...

He's an innocent man.

We hope, anyway. In this day and age it's impossible to tell who is lying,
telling the truth, or accidently doped by eating chocolates from Chile or
Peru, or eating some 'powerbar' containing various stimulants or sterioids
that an athlete does not know is in there.

As for me, I think all of the riders are dirty to some extent, even if it's
something as simple as taking ephedra or similar stimulating herb, but it
doesn't bother me. Hell, I used to use ephedrine (a.k.a. "Max Alert",
"white crosses", et al) back in '94-'95 on days when I did interval training
but I was just a little tired from work that day.

Kelly Beard

Scott said:

My hunch, and it's just a hunch, is that they're trying very hard to
put some sort of less-than-f'd up spin on the announcement that they
don't have a definitive case against Tyler. They won't declare him
clean, just admit that they can't quite declare him dirty.

Well, one thing I picked up from reading Bergman's decision is that
there is no precise definition of a positive test result for EPO.
He came in slightly less positive according to the standard used in
prior cases and they zapped him anyway. Which they could do because
there really isn't a standard at all.

Regardless of the result of any individual case, the idea that a
positive test result could be a moving target is something that bugs
me.

Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]