I have read that the number of males born annually relative to that of the number of females, in the
human population, is approximately a constant of
51/49. Since males are at a greater risk of death this difference might help promote a more equal
distribution at the time of fertility.
My first question is this: how is this proportion maintained? I am at a loss to understand how it
could be maintained except through feedback. If this is so, by what means does this feedback assert
itself? Is it, for instance, conceivable that we unconsciously modulate the likelihood of male
versus female birth via observations made in our brains?
My second question is this: In lions we see social groups (i.e. prides) in which females outnumber
males by several-to-one. Our species has a more one-to-one ratio. First, is there a difference in
the birth ratios of females to males between lions and humans? Certainly, a male lion fights more
for the simple opportunity to reproduce than we do. Is there in fact a difference between the nature
of male competition between lions and humans? Is it that lions compete more for the simple
opportunity to reproduce whereas humans compete more for the most highly prized females?
John Leonard