Whats the real compromise when opting for tubeless tires over traditional tubes? Are we really gaining that much in terms of puncture resistance and rolling resistance, or are we sacrificing too much in terms of versatility and simplicity?
I mean, think about it - with tubes, you can easily switch between different wheelsets, or swap out a tire for a different one if youre heading out on a different type of ride. You can also easily patch a tube if you get a puncture, and be back on the road in no time. And lets not forget about the cost - tubes are generally much cheaper than tubeless tires, especially if youre running a high-end wheelset.
But with tubeless tires, youre stuck with the wheelset and tire combo youve got. If you want to switch to a different tire or wheelset, youve got to completely re-set up the whole system. And if you get a puncture, youre either stuck roadside trying to fix it, or youre waiting for a spare to arrive. And all this for what - a few watts of saved energy? A few grams of weight savings?
Is the convenience and simplicity of tubes really being outweighed by the marginal gains of tubeless tires? Are we really getting the best of both worlds, or are we just getting a more complicated and expensive system thats only beneficial for a select few? Whats the real compromise here, and are we willing to make it?
I mean, think about it - with tubes, you can easily switch between different wheelsets, or swap out a tire for a different one if youre heading out on a different type of ride. You can also easily patch a tube if you get a puncture, and be back on the road in no time. And lets not forget about the cost - tubes are generally much cheaper than tubeless tires, especially if youre running a high-end wheelset.
But with tubeless tires, youre stuck with the wheelset and tire combo youve got. If you want to switch to a different tire or wheelset, youve got to completely re-set up the whole system. And if you get a puncture, youre either stuck roadside trying to fix it, or youre waiting for a spare to arrive. And all this for what - a few watts of saved energy? A few grams of weight savings?
Is the convenience and simplicity of tubes really being outweighed by the marginal gains of tubeless tires? Are we really getting the best of both worlds, or are we just getting a more complicated and expensive system thats only beneficial for a select few? Whats the real compromise here, and are we willing to make it?