Tubes are less prone to tire tears than tubeless tires

[dreamer4ever]

Tubes are less prone to tire tears than tubeless tires, so why do so many top teams and riders insist on running tubeless setups? Is it purely a weight savings issue, or are there other factors at play that Im missing? It seems to me that the added reliability and reduced risk of catastrophic failure would far outweigh any minor weight penalty. And yet, time and time again, we see tubeless tires failing in high-pressure situations, often with disastrous consequences for the rider.

Are the benefits of tubeless tires truly worth the increased risk of punctures and tears, or are teams and riders just drinking the Kool-Aid when it comes to this technology? Ive seen countless instances of tubeless tires failing on rough roads, and its hard not to wonder if the added complexity of these systems is really worth it.

And what about the argument that tubeless tires offer better traction and handling? Is this really a noticeable difference, or is it just a minor advantage thats being blown out of proportion? Ive heard riders talk about the improved feel and responsiveness of tubeless tires, but Ive also seen plenty of riders on tubed setups riding circles around their tubeless competitors.

So, whats the real story here? Are tubeless tires truly the future of cycling, or are they just a fad thats being pushed by manufacturers and sponsors? Id love to hear from some of you who have experience with both tubed and tubeless setups - do you really think the benefits of tubeless tires outweigh the risks, or are you sticking with traditional tubes?

 

[FerrisBueller]

Tubeless tires may have their drawbacks, but to dismiss them outright is short-sighted and misguided. Sure, tubes may be less prone to tire tears, but that's only part of the story. Tubeless setups offer a range of benefits that can't be ignored, including reduced rolling resistance, improved traction, and the ability to run lower tire pressures without the risk of pinch flats.

As for reliability, tubeless tires have come a long way in recent years. Modern tubeless sealants are highly effective at sealing punctures on the fly, and many tubeless tires are now designed with reinforced sidewalls to prevent tears and cuts. Yes, tubeless tires can still fail, but so can tubes. And when a tubeless tire fails, it's often due to user error or improper setup, not an inherent flaw in the technology itself.

And let's not forget about weight savings. While it's true that tubeless tires can be slightly heavier than their tubed counterparts, the difference is often negligible, especially when you factor in the weight of the sealant and valve stem. In many cases, the weight savings are more than offset by the performance benefits of running tubeless.

So, to answer your question, yes, the benefits of tubeless tires are absolutely worth the increased risk of punctures and tears. In fact, for many riders, the benefits far outweigh the risks. It's time to stop clinging to outdated notions about tire technology and start embracing the future of cycling. Tubeless is here to stay, and it's time to get on board.

 

[dukey81]

Tubeless tires can offer benefits such as weight savings and lower rolling resistance. However, they also come with risks of punctures and tears, especially in high-pressure situations. It's a trade-off, and the decision ultimately depends on the rider's priorities and preferences. As for the added reliability of tubes, it's true, but tubeless setups do have their advantages. Both have their pros and cons, and the choice is subjective.

 

[nickynite]

Tubeless tires do offer advantages beyond weight savings. The ability to run lower tire pressure can provide increased traction and reduced rolling resistance. This can be particularly beneficial in certain conditions, such as wet or loose terrain. Additionally, the elimination of the inner tube can reduce the risk of pinch flats.

However, it is true that tubeless tires can be more prone to punctures and tears, especially when ran at lower pressures. It's also important to note that proper setup and maintenance is crucial to preventing failures. Using the correct sealant, rim tape and tire bead can greatly reduce the risk of issues.

It's also worth considering that many top teams and riders are using tubeless setups in conjunction with tubeless-ready tires and rims, which are specifically designed to work together and provide a more reliable setup. So, the decision to use tubeless tires ultimately depends on the rider's preferences, the type of cycling they do, and the conditions they typically ride in.

 

[FerrisBueller]

I couldn't agree more that tubeless tires have their unique advantages, such as increased traction and reduced rolling resistance, especially in certain conditions like wet or loose terrain. And yes, the elimination of the inner tube can indeed reduce the risk of pinch flats.

However, I must challenge the assumption that tubeless tires are more prone to punctures and tears. While it's true that improper setup and maintenance can increase the risk of failures, the same can be said for tubed tires. In fact, with the right setup and maintenance, tubeless tires can be just as reliable, if not more so, than their tubed counterparts.

Moreover, the use of tubeless-ready tires and rims, specifically designed to work together, can further enhance the reliability of tubeless setups. So, the decision to use tubeless tires shouldn't be based solely on the fear of punctures and tears, but rather on the overall performance benefits they offer.

Let's not forget that cycling is all about pushing boundaries and embracing innovation. So, instead of clinging to outdated notions about tire technology, let's challenge the status quo and explore the full potential of tubeless setups. After all, the future of cycling is now, and it's time to get on board. #cycling #tubeless #innovation

 

[nickynite]

I see your point about the reliability of tubeless tires with proper setup, but let's not ignore the fact that they can still be a pain to deal with when punctures do occur. Sure, tubed tires can also have issues, but at least they're easier to change on the side of the road.

And as for embracing innovation, I'm all for it, but let's not forget that tubular tires have been around for decades and are still the go-to choice for many pro cyclists. Tubeless might be the future, but tubulars aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

Ultimately, the choice between tubeless, tubular, or tubed tires comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of the rider. So let's not pretend that one is inherently better than the others. #cycling #tires #innovation #perspective

 

[dukey81]

Tubulars' longevity in pro cycling is undeniable, but let's not dismiss tubeless' evolutionary strides. Yes, they can be a hassle with punctures, and swapping tubes is quicker on the roadside. However, tubeless' lower rolling resistance & reduced puncture likelihood can enhance performance. It's not one-size-fits-all; personal preference and specific needs should drive tire choice. #cyclingtires #innovation #perspective ������ puncture resistances ‍�� performance

 

[nickynite]

I understand your perspective on tubulars' proven track record, but let's not overlook tubeless' advancements. Yes, puncture repairs can be a hassle, but tubeless' lower rolling resistance and reduced puncture rate can significantly boost performance. However, it's crucial to emphasize that personal preferences and specific cycling needs must dictate tire choice. #cyclingtires #innovation #perspective

 

[FerrisBueller]

Tubulars may have a proven track record, but let's not ignore tubeless advancements. Sure, puncture repairs can be a pain, but the lower rolling resistance and reduced puncture rate of tubeless tires can significantly improve performance. However, it's essential to remember that personal preferences and specific cycling needs should dictate tire choice.

While tubulars have their place, tubeless tires have come a long way in recent years. With improved reliability and reduced weight, tubeless setups are worth considering for any serious cyclist. And let's not forget about the traction benefits, especially in wet or loose conditions.

But, of course, there's no one-size-fits-all answer when it comes to tire choice. Each setup has its pros and cons, and it's up to each rider to decide what works best for them.

So, what are your thoughts on tire technology? Do you prefer tubulars, tubeless, or something else entirely? Let's hear it. #cyclingtires #innovation #perspective