Is it really a given that tubes are easier to install with a tire iron than tubeless tires, or is this just a myth perpetuated by those who havent taken the time to master the tubeless system? Its often said that tubeless tires require a compressor or a CO2 cartridge to seat the bead, but what about the argument that this initial investment of time and equipment pays off in the long run with the potential for lower maintenance and increased reliability?
Isnt it also true that traditional tubes can be just as finicky when it comes to installation, especially when it comes to ensuring the tire is properly seated and centered on the rim? And what about the potential for pinch flats and other issues that can arise when using a tire iron to install a tube?
Are we just accepting the status quo when it comes to tube installation, or are there some cyclists out there who have found innovative ways to make the process easier and more efficient? And on the flip side, are the benefits of tubeless tires being overstated, or is there really a significant advantage to be had by switching to a tubeless system?
Perhaps the real question is, whats the threshold for considering a tubeless system to be easier to install than a traditional tube? Is it a matter of personal preference, or are there some objective criteria that can be used to make a comparison?
Isnt it also true that traditional tubes can be just as finicky when it comes to installation, especially when it comes to ensuring the tire is properly seated and centered on the rim? And what about the potential for pinch flats and other issues that can arise when using a tire iron to install a tube?
Are we just accepting the status quo when it comes to tube installation, or are there some cyclists out there who have found innovative ways to make the process easier and more efficient? And on the flip side, are the benefits of tubeless tires being overstated, or is there really a significant advantage to be had by switching to a tubeless system?
Perhaps the real question is, whats the threshold for considering a tubeless system to be easier to install than a traditional tube? Is it a matter of personal preference, or are there some objective criteria that can be used to make a comparison?