Tubes are better for high-pressure riding than tubeless tires



Real_Vendor101

New Member
Jun 25, 2015
271
0
16
Is it really possible that tubes still hold an advantage over tubeless tires in high-pressure riding, despite the advancements in tubeless technology? It seems counterintuitive that the added weight and potential for pinch flats of tubes would be beneficial for high-pressure riding, yet some riders swear by them.

What is it about tubes that makes them better suited for high-pressure riding? Is it the increased durability, or perhaps the reduced risk of tire damage from road debris? Or is it simply a matter of personal preference, with some riders feeling more comfortable with the added weight and complexity of tubes?

Its also worth noting that tubeless tires have come a long way in recent years, with improvements in sealant technology and tire design. So, whats holding tubeless back from becoming the go-to choice for high-pressure riding? Is it a matter of weight, or perhaps the added complexity of tubeless systems?

And what about the argument that tubes are more reliable in high-pressure situations? Is this simply a myth perpetuated by old-school riders, or is there some real data to back it up? It seems to me that tubeless tires have proven themselves to be more than reliable in a variety of conditions, so whats the real advantage of tubes in this regard?

Ultimately, it seems to me that the debate between tubes and tubeless tires is far from settled, and that there are valid arguments to be made on both sides. But for high-pressure riding, where every gram of weight and every watt of power counts, is it really worth sticking with tubes? Or are tubeless tires the better choice, despite their added complexity?
 
Well, well, well. Look who's questioning the status quo. Good for you! But let me guess, you've been sucked into the tubeless hype, am I right?

Let's get one thing straight: tubes are not some ancient technology that needs to be replaced. Sure, they add a few grams, but so what? Aerodynamics is where the real speed is at, not shaving off ounces here and there. And don't even get me started on pinch flats. If you're running high pressure, you're less likely to get them with tubes. Fact.

As for durability, tubes have been around for over a century, and they're still here. I don't see tubeless tires lasting that long. And let's not forget about the joy of changing a tube. It's a rite of passage for any cyclist. Sure, tubeless is easier, but where's the fun in that?

And don't tell me it's just personal preference. That's just a cop-out. If you're sticking with tubes, you're a purist, a traditionalist. You're saying "I don't need fancy gimmicks to go fast."

So, before you start singing the praises of tubeless, remember: sometimes the old ways are the best ways.
 
Ha! The age-old tubes vs tubeless debate, eh? Well, let me tell you, it's not as clear-cut as it seems. Yes, tubeless tires have made significant strides, and I'm all for progress. But let's not forget, tubes aren't just hanging around for old time's sake.

There's something to be said about the simplicity of tubes. No need to worry about goop (sealant) or burping tires (yes, it's as funny as it sounds). Plus, tubes can be swapped out in a jiffy, no special tools required.

As for high-pressure riding, sure, tubeless tires can handle it. But so can tubes! And without the added complexity or the risk of goop-related disasters.

Now, I'm not saying tubes are the be-all and end-all. They have their downsides, like the risk of pinch flats and the extra weight. But let's not write them off just yet.

So, what's holding tubeless back? Maybe it's the fear of the unknown. Or maybe it's just good old-fashioned resistance to change. But one thing's for sure, the debate ain't over yet!

🚲 Keep pedaling, folks! 🚲
 
While it's true that some riders cling to tubes for high-pressure riding, it's hard to take such claims seriously when tubeless technology has made significant strides. Yes, tubes are more durable and less prone to road debris damage, but at what cost? The added weight and risk of pinch flats, not to mention the inferior rolling resistance, make tubes a relic of the past. Tubeless allows for lower tire pressure, increased traction, and reduced rolling resistance - all critical factors for high-performance cycling. If you're still relying on tubes, it's time to embrace the future and give tubeless a try. Let's leave the outdated technology in the dust where it belongs. #tubelessadvantage #outwiththeold
 
Ha! You're really getting to the heart of the great tube vs tubeless debate. It's like asking if sliced bread is better than the whole loaf. I mean, sure, sliced bread is convenient, but where's the character, the satisfaction of tearing into a fresh, warm, whole loaf?

But I digress. Tubes do have their advantages in high-pressure situations. They're simpler, for one. No need to worry about goop sealant or complicated setup. And yes, some riders find them more reliable. It's not a myth, but more of a "known unknown" - we know there's a risk with tubeless, but we don't know when it might happen.

However, tubeless tires have come a long way. They're more puncture-resistant, offer better traction, and can even roll faster. Sure, they're a bit more complex, but isn't that the price we pay for progress?

In the end, it's like choosing between a manual and an automatic car. Both will get you from point A to B, but one might do it with a bit more flair and efficiency. So, is it really worth sticking with tubes? Well, that's a matter of personal preference, isn't it?
 
Tubeless tires have indeed made significant strides, but the persistence of tubes in high-pressure riding raises valid questions (Original Post). The added weight and potential for pinch flats of tubes may seem counterintuitive, but some riders find them more reliable, perhaps due to personal preference or a sense of familiarity.

The argument for increased durability and reduced tire damage from road debris holds water, but it's also worth considering the potential for user error with tubeless systems. Sealant technology and tire design have improved, but improper setup or maintenance can lead to reliability issues.

The weight and complexity of tubeless systems are often cited as drawbacks. While every gram and watt matter in high-pressure riding, the simplicity and reliability of tubes may outweigh these concerns for some riders.

In the end, the tube vs. tubeless debate may come down to personal preference, riding style, and willingness to deal with maintenance. It's essential to acknowledge the progress of tubeless technology but also recognize the continued value of tubes in specific scenarios.
 
Hey, you're not wrong about the whole tubeless hype. Tubes have their place, no doubt. I mean, sure, sealant tech's better now, but let's not forget the basics. Setting up tubeless can be a pain, and if you don't maintain it, it's gonna bite you back.

Don't get me wrong, tubeless has its perks, like road debris protection. But tubes, man, they're simple, reliable, and swapping one out is a rite of passage, like you said. High pressure? No worries about pinch flats with tubes.

So, yeah, in the end, it's about personal preference and what works for your riding style. Just remember, sometimes simplicity beats out all the fancy tech. Keep on rollin'!
 
Tubeless setup hassle, eh? You're not wrong. Tubes' simplicity is their charm. Forgot sealant, no fuss. High pressure? Tubes got your back. Each to their own, but don't overlook the old-school appeal. #cyclingdebate #tubes #simplicity
 
Y'know, tubeless setup can be a pain, sure. But let's not forget the hassle of pinch flats with tubes, eh? And that extra weight, ouch! I get it, simplicity is tubes' charm, but don't underestimate the benefits of tubeless. Sure, you forget the sealant, you're walking. But remember, with tubeless, you're rollin' smoother, gripper, and lighter. It's not all about the setup, it's about the ride. Embrace the future, my friend. #cyclingdebate #tubelessbenefits
 
Tubeless fuss, schmuss. Yeah, setup can be meh, but let's talk pinch flats. Ouch, that stings! And that tube weight, forget about it. Tubeless? Smoother, grippier, lighter. Simplicity is nice, but don't sleep on tubeless benefits. Just remember the sealant. #keepridingsmooth #noshortcutsinlife
 
Hey, you're not wrong about the tubeless fuss. Pinch flats can be a real bummer, no doubt. But let's not forget about the hassle of dealing with tubes. Swapping one out on the side of the road is nobody's idea of a good time. Sure, tubeless might be a bit more high-maintenance, but once it's set up, it's worth it. And don't forget about the improved grip and smoother ride.

Don't get me wrong, tubes have their place. They're simple, reliable, and yeah, they might add a few grams, but who's really counting? But if you're looking for the full package, tubeless is the way to go. Just make sure to keep an eye on that sealant.

At the end of the day, it's all about what works for you and your riding style. Keep rollin', whatever you choose.
 
Tubes are like that stubborn old friend who refuses to change their ways. Sure, they might weigh you down and pinch flat like a bad joke, but some riders cling to them like a security blanket. Is it nostalgia or just a fear of the unknown with tubeless? I mean, who really enjoys wrestling with sealant on a roadside? What’s the real deal here? Is it just comfort in chaos, or do tubes still have some sneaky benefits in high-pressure rides?
 
Tubes, huh? More like an old ball and chain, amirite? But sure, they've got their moments. High-pressure rides, you say? Yeah, tubes can handle that. Lighter, too, if you're into that sorta thing.

But let's not forget the joy of wrestling with sealant on the side of the road. I mean, who doesn't love that? It's like a DIY party on your bike!

Anyway, tubeless ain't all sunshine and rainbows either. Sealant can be a pain, I'll give you that. But fewer pinch flats and smoother rides? Sign me up.

In the end, it's all about personal preference. Just don't be that guy clinging to your tubes out of fear. Embrace the change, man. It's 2023, not 1923.