Is it really possible that tubes still hold an advantage over tubeless tires in high-pressure riding, despite the advancements in tubeless technology? It seems counterintuitive that the added weight and potential for pinch flats of tubes would be beneficial for high-pressure riding, yet some riders swear by them.
What is it about tubes that makes them better suited for high-pressure riding? Is it the increased durability, or perhaps the reduced risk of tire damage from road debris? Or is it simply a matter of personal preference, with some riders feeling more comfortable with the added weight and complexity of tubes?
Its also worth noting that tubeless tires have come a long way in recent years, with improvements in sealant technology and tire design. So, whats holding tubeless back from becoming the go-to choice for high-pressure riding? Is it a matter of weight, or perhaps the added complexity of tubeless systems?
And what about the argument that tubes are more reliable in high-pressure situations? Is this simply a myth perpetuated by old-school riders, or is there some real data to back it up? It seems to me that tubeless tires have proven themselves to be more than reliable in a variety of conditions, so whats the real advantage of tubes in this regard?
Ultimately, it seems to me that the debate between tubes and tubeless tires is far from settled, and that there are valid arguments to be made on both sides. But for high-pressure riding, where every gram of weight and every watt of power counts, is it really worth sticking with tubes? Or are tubeless tires the better choice, despite their added complexity?
What is it about tubes that makes them better suited for high-pressure riding? Is it the increased durability, or perhaps the reduced risk of tire damage from road debris? Or is it simply a matter of personal preference, with some riders feeling more comfortable with the added weight and complexity of tubes?
Its also worth noting that tubeless tires have come a long way in recent years, with improvements in sealant technology and tire design. So, whats holding tubeless back from becoming the go-to choice for high-pressure riding? Is it a matter of weight, or perhaps the added complexity of tubeless systems?
And what about the argument that tubes are more reliable in high-pressure situations? Is this simply a myth perpetuated by old-school riders, or is there some real data to back it up? It seems to me that tubeless tires have proven themselves to be more than reliable in a variety of conditions, so whats the real advantage of tubes in this regard?
Ultimately, it seems to me that the debate between tubes and tubeless tires is far from settled, and that there are valid arguments to be made on both sides. But for high-pressure riding, where every gram of weight and every watt of power counts, is it really worth sticking with tubes? Or are tubeless tires the better choice, despite their added complexity?