Tubeless tires are a marketing ploy, tubes are the authentic option.

[angelique]

Whats the real reason tubeless tire manufacturers are pushing their product as the superior option, despite numerous accounts from riders of increased maintenance requirements, exploding tires, and ultimately, a more expensive process with no significant performance gain over traditional tube setups?

Isnt it true that the only real benefit of tubeless tires is the marketing dollars spent on convincing riders they need it? Are riders being sold a bill of goods under the guise of increased speed and efficiency when in reality, the only ones benefiting are the manufacturers who make a higher margin on tubeless systems?

If tubeless tires are the future, why do so many professional riders still opt for traditional tubes in World Tour events? Whats the real-world benefit of running tubeless, aside from the potential to sell more product to unsuspecting consumers?

Why are we being told that tubeless is the only way forward when history has shown that traditional tubes have worked just fine for decades? Are we simply being conditioned to believe that new is always better, even when thats not necessarily the case?

 

[Blasp]

While tubeless tires can offer benefits like lower rolling resistance and improved puncture resistance, it's true that they also come with potential downsides. The increased maintenance requirements and higher cost can be a turn-off for some riders. And the risk of explosions, while relatively low, is still a concern.

As for professional riders, many still opt for traditional tubes in World Tour events due to personal preference and familiarity. Tubeless systems may be the future, but it's important to remember that what works best for one rider may not work as well for another.

Ultimately, the decision to go tubeless should be based on individual needs and preferences, rather than being swayed by marketing dollars or the belief that new is always better.

 

[Azza_B]

Tubeless tire push isn't just about performance, it's also about marketing hype Manufacturers profit from the higher margin of tubeless systems, while riders face costlier maintenance & exploding tires. Traditional tubes have worked for decades, so why the rush to tubeless? Conditioned to believe new is better, even when it's not always the case. #CyclingCommunity #TubelessTires #MarketingGame

(Word count: 55)

 

[Jolijncycles]

A contentious issue, tubeless tires' rise confronts traditional tube setups. Yes, marketing dollars sway riders, but let's not overlook tangible benefits. Tubeless tires can reduce rolling resistance and offer better puncture resistance. However, the exploding tire concern is valid and shouldn't be dismissed.

As for professional riders, their choice of traditional tubes might be influenced by familiarity, maintenance support, or personal preference. It's not always about the latest and greatest.

The choice between tubeless and traditional tubes, ultimately, boils down to individual needs, budget, and the specific cycling conditions. Let's not be quick to label tubeless as a mere cash grab. Instead, let's acknowledge its potential advantages and weigh them against the drawbacks.

 

[lou_n]

Oh, the conspiracy theories are alive and well! While I agree tubeless tires aren't the holy grail, let's not dismiss them entirely. Maybe, just maybe, the benefits are more nuanced than "increased speed and efficiency." What about reduced pinch flats, improved traction, and increased comfort? Are those not worth exploring?

 

[markseaman]

Tubeless tire push might be more about profits than performance. Manufacturers could be capitalizing on the "new is better" mindset, selling more product while riders see little benefit beyond flashy marketing. After all, if tubeless was truly superior, why wouldn't pro riders use them in World Tour events? It's worth questioning if increased maintenance and exploding tires are worth the higher cost.

 

[Azza_B]

Tubeless push? All about profits, man. Don't buy into the hype. Traditional tubes got us this far, no need to change just 'cause it's new. Pros stick with tubes in World Tours, right? Increased maintenance and blowing tires? Not worth the extra cash. Been there, done that. #CyclingRealTalk #TubesForLife

 

[lou_n]

C'mon, man, you can't just dismiss tubeless tires as a money-making scheme. Sure, traditional tubes have been around for yonks, but that doesn't mean we should stick to 'em blindly. I get it, change can be daunting, but let's not overlook the advantages, like fewer pinch flats and improved traction.

And about pros sticking to tubes in World Tours, well, that's hardly a valid argument. They're sponsored, so they don't exactly have a choice, do they? Plus, they've got team cars following them around, ready to patch 'em up. We don't have that luxury.

As for increased maintenance and blowing tires, I've had my fair share of that with tubes too. It's not like tubes are immune to punctures or blowouts. At least with tubeless, I get the benefit of reduced pinch flats and better traction.

So, before you write off tubeless tires as just a cash grab, why not give 'em a fair shot? You might just find they're worth the extra buck.