Road Cycling · Public discussion

Trek 7700FX

Started by M Powell · · Last activity · 4 posts · 729 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 August 2004
Last activity
31 August 2004
Original author
M Powell
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
729
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised that
    the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
    cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike there
    was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
    need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you change
    out the cassette?

    --M. Powell
    remove first p to reply

  2. Quoted message said:

    New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
    that
    the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
    cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
    there
    was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
    need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
    change
    out the cassette?

    That's pretty much a "feature" of a wide-range cassette. Since it's a
    9-speed, you have many options available, if you don't mind slicing off a
    bit of the low-end.

    Where is the jump that you're noticing?

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    "M Powell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
    that
    the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
    cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
    there
    was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
    need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
    change
    out the cassette?

    --M. Powell
    remove first p to reply

  3. Its a wider gear ratio used on that model.(ala touring bikes and mountain
    bikes)
    If it is not to your liking, by all means change out the cassette.

    Paul

    "M Powell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised
    that
    the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
    cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike
    there
    was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
    need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you
    change
    out the cassette?

    --M. Powell
    remove first p to reply

  4. Quoted message said:

    New bike, with about 300 miles on it. It's a 9-speed, and I'm surprised that
    the gears seem spaced more widely than I'm expecting. Seems like I get a
    cadence choice of either 95 or 85 to maintain a speed. On my old bike there
    was more like a 6-rpm difference. Is this a Trek/Shimano "feature"that I
    need to get used to, or is this a personal preference item where you change
    out the cassette?

    --M. Powell
    remove first p to reply

    I have the same bike. It seems like the big front cog is way too big, I
    generally use the middle ring. I like the bike quite a bit though, how about
    you? If you change the cassette out, please post your results.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.