Triathlon · Public discussion

Trek 5500 opinions?

Started by Rivermist · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,471 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Triathlon
Published
21 June 2004
Last activity
22 June 2004
Original author
Rivermist
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,471
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Am thinking of buying a Trek 5500. If anyone has any
    experience or knowledge about this bike I would appreciate
    their opinion.

  2. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Rivermist said:

    Am thinking of buying a Trek 5500. If anyone has any
    experience or knowledge about this bike I would appreciate
    their opinion.


    I am currently riding my second 5500. The first one became
    expensive splinters after a car rear ended me. Fortunately
    for the past eight years without any significant impacts the
    bike still serves me well today. I plan to install a new
    gruppo soon.

    I am a 6'2'', 175 lb rider. I purchased my first and second
    5500s for bike racing. At that time I though my triathlon
    days were behind me. For my size, the 5500 is light, almost
    as stiff as an oversized aluminum tube frame (Klein or
    Cannondale, for instance) and seemingly as smooth as a high
    quality steel frame. I set my 40km TT pr on my present bike.
    However, the setup for a bicycle time trial that might be
    followed by a criterium or road race in my in my case was
    useless for doing triathlons because of that pesky run.

    So before I start prattling on forever: does the bike fit
    you for its intended purpose? If the bike fits, buy it! If
    not, consider others. My 60cm frame is great for fast
    training and bike racing. If I decide to switch back to
    triathlons, then a different frame and fit will serve me
    better for the bike portion of the race.

    David (for the geekly, the fingerprint contains my
    email address)
    - --
    gnupg fingerprint: 4055 65EC 24D1 1DC2 700C 6654 6009 4AB9
    F4C3 3E7E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG
    v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8
    <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

    iD8DBQFA114KYAlKufTDPn4RAsuIAKCvhCSV3EwKgU1vYzTykPe1OJGWlQC-
    fXsmm aRrOPHgNMD/ZkIZxY7sEDfY= =vnBq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  3. "Rivermist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:P6GBc.154768$Ly.59812@attbi_s01...

    Quoted message said:

    Am thinking of buying a Trek 5500. If anyone has any
    experience or knowledge about this bike I would appreciate
    their opinion.

    My experience is along the same lines as David's. I bought
    mine for tri's, also a 60cm, but I weight 210 lbs.
    Unfortunately, I was seduced by the frame material and did
    not pay close attention to the geometry.

    It is a wonderful feel/fit for cycling but, for me, is very
    awkward feeling when tricked for a tri. I use a Trek 2300
    "beater" for racing and aero trainnig.

    The more technical the course is, the more fun it is to
    ride.

    Last thing, the cable guides (top tube) continually come
    off. I have to clean and re-epoxy every year. If it happens
    more often than that I "make do" with a tie-wrap until the
    next major cleaning.

    rsquared

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.