Road Cycling · Public discussion

TREK 4300

Started by John Schlesinge · · Last activity · 2 posts · 3,313 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
7 March 2003
Last activity
7 March 2003
Original author
John Schlesinge
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,313
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A representative from TREK recommended the trek 4300 for me (the 300 pounder looking for a bike)
    they said it would support me without any problem. Can anyone give me their personal opinions on
    this bike. I have read some unflattering remarks about TREK. Thanks John

  2. John Schlesinger said:

    Can anyone give me their personal opinions on this bike. I have read some unflattering remarks
    about TREK.

    I own a 4300. It is most definitely an entry-level MTB. I very quickly grew out of its capability
    for MTBing. If you're going to get serious about off-road riding, get something a little further up
    their line.

    When I got the bike, I only weighed 120 pounds (6'1"😉. However, I did scream downhill on a rocky
    slope at 25mph once. I hit a sharp stone, the bike came to a dead halt, and I fell hard. The impact
    was strong enough to burst the front tube. I broke two spokes. The fork and rim were undamaged.

    That's pretty strong for an entry-level bike.

    --
    Gopi Sundaram

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.