UK and Europe · Public discussion

Torygraph - Cyclists face prosecution

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 4 posts · 403 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
19 May 2007
Last activity
19 May 2007
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
403
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GOVBACBK0N3CBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/05/19/ncycle19.xml

    Cyclists face prosecution for not using lanes

    By David Millward, Transport Correspondent
    Last Updated: 2:23am BST 19/05/2007

    Cyclists who fail to use lanes provided for them could face prosecution
    as a result of changes to the Highway Code, it became clear last night.

    The new code, which radically tilts the balance against cyclists, may
    come into force as early as next week unless MPs and peers manage to
    block it. A number of politicians in both houses are ready to object
    after being lobbied by cycling groups.

    The wording of the relevant passage has been the subject of intense
    debate over the past few months.

    According to the present version of the Highway Code, cycle routes
    should be used "when practicable". A revised version said they should be
    used "where they are provided". Then, in a concession to cyclists, the
    latest version was changed to instruct them to use lanes "wherever
    possible".

    Although the changes in wording appear very subtle, their legal impact
    could be considerable, according to CTC, formerly known as the Cyclists'
    Touring Club.

    The 1988 Road Traffic Act created the offence of "inconsiderate
    cycling", which is guided by the Highway Code.
    advertisement

    That was the offence used to convict Daniel Cadden last year after he
    was arrested for failing to use a cycle lane.

    However, the conviction by a district judge was overturned by Shrewsbury
    Crown Court in January - on the basis of the existing wording.

    "Under the revised wording, we fear that Daniel's conviction would not
    have been overturned," said Richard George, CTC's campaigns officer. "If
    this version of the Highway Code is adopted we fear many more cyclists
    will be prosecuted for similar offences, despite having as much of a
    right to use the road as anyone else."

    Even if cyclists are not pulled over and prosecuted, their legal
    position in the event of an accident has also been changed as a result
    of the new code.

    A driver hitting a cyclist who ignored a cycle lane would be free to
    pursue a claim of contributory negligence.

    CTC also fears that the revised wording will leave five million cyclists
    vulnerable to more aggression from motorists, who will argue that the
    existence of lanes means that the rest of the road is the province of
    those in cars.

    Denis MacShane, Labour MP for Rotherham, is among those at Westminster
    concerned about the wording.

    He has called on Douglas Alexander, the Transport Secretary, to provide
    assurances that cyclists will not be left vulnerable to prosecution.

    "I am very worried that some officious police officer may seek to arrest
    some granny or middle-aged MP plodding along on her or his bike," said
    Mr MacShane.

    Edmund King, the executive director of the RAC Foundation, had some
    sympathy for the cyclists' position. "There is no doubt that some cycle
    lanes are by their very nature dangerous," he said.

    "There is a need to address cycle safety, but I am not sure that the
    Highway Code is the best way to address it."

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  2. Tony Raven said:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GOVBACBK0N3CBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/05/19/ncycle19.xml

    [Snip quoted text]

    This was also discussed on Breakfast News.

    ==========

    News journalist: The Telegraph reports today planned changes in the
    highway code which, according to cycling groups, will force cyclists
    to use cycle lanes and make it illegal to cycle in the road.

    Presenter #1: But cycle lanes are ridden with potholes, supermarket
    trollies and parked cars.

    Presenter #2: So some old granny, fearful of using one, could
    potentially face arrest for cycling on the road.

    News journalist: It's a bit of a play on the interpretation by the
    cycling lobby groups, but yes, potentially that could happen. But if
    the Commons doesn't block the revisions, peers are lining up to step
    in to save cyclists.

    ==========

    NOTE: The above is a very loose interpretation of what was actually
    said, but is my understanding of what was meant.

  3. On 19/05/2007 09:19, Tony Raven said,

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GOVBACBK0N3CBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/05/19/ncycle19.xml

    Oh great - so a typical reader will see the headline and now
    automatically assume that it's illegal for cyclists to use the road if
    there's a cyclepath near.

    That'll do us a lot of good :-(

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  4. Paul Boyd said:

    On 19/05/2007 09:19, Tony Raven said,

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=GOVBACBK0N3CBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/05/19/ncycle19.xml

    Quoted message said:

    Oh great - so a typical reader will see the headline and now
    automatically assume that it's illegal for cyclists to use the road if
    there's a cyclepath near.

    <TYPE=STEREO>Fortunately I don't think WVM reads the Torygraph</TYPE>

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.