I am surprised the speedboat didn't win. What is the speed limit along the Thames?
That was the catch. It was something like 9mph until a certain bridge, then unlimited. JC was belting along at 75mph once unfettered, but the river has a few twists and turns in it apparently, which added a lot of mileage.
"Sorry - to use the BBC iPlayer you need the following
* Windows XP * Internet Explorer 6 (or later) * Windows Media Player 10 (or later)"
So anyone on not wedded to Micro$oft is excluded. Thank god the restriction wasn't to Vista.
The Beeb have claimed that they will open up to other platforms when they go for a full launch.
Yes, but they also claimed that their site was only accessed by 600 Linux users, which seems unlikely because I know 4 of them personally. They later shamefacedly revised that to something like 90,000.
In article <[email hidden]>, Peter Clinch <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
It was a race between 4 modes of transport from Kew Bridge to London City Airport. The contestants were Hammond on a bike, James May in a Chelsea Tractor, Clarkson in a power boat going along the Thames (though limited speed until Wandsworth bridge, according to Thames navigation rules), and The Stig on public transport.
A few years back the Evening Standard did something similar (and I think there have been several other such challenges before that), but the distance was only a couple of miles or so in the West End area. Not completely sure, but taking part were a bus, bike and taxi, and possible a motorbike.
Either the motorbike or bicycle won, though for some reason the route included a section that buses don't normally take (possible Pall Mall). -- congokid Eating out in London? Read my tips... http://congokid.com
"Sorry - to use the BBC iPlayer you need the following
* Windows XP * Internet Explorer 6 (or later) * Windows Media Player 10 (or later)"
The Pirate Bay doesn't restrict you to Windows only. Since I pay my TV license, I see nothing wrong in getting a BBC programme that I've missed from a torrent on The Pirate Bay.
-- From the sunny Isle of Man. Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
In news:[email hidden], Pete Biggs <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:
Quoted message said:
I thought Hammond did pretty well except for his anger towards buses - as if he'd never seen a bus before.
Anger towards buses is London is a perfectly normal reaction :-(
Especially when you've seen what they do before. I think Hamster has done this cycling thing before. I doubt whether the Beeb's insurers would have insured Clarkson to ride. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"
In article <[email hidden]>, Dave Larrington [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
In news:[email hidden], Rob Morley <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, Dave Larrington [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
Anger towards buses is London is a perfectly normal reaction :-(
But so unhealthy. Why not just accept them as an inconvenience like bad weather, and get on with life?
Bad weather, in London at least, is unlikely to prove fatal?
Apparently about 5 people are killed by lightning each year in the UK, and we get the occasional hurricane/tornado fatality, but there are less newsworthy weather-related deaths caused by heat, cold, wind, flooding - people don't seem to get particularly angry about those. I wonder in how many deaths does traffic /stress/ as opposed to physical danger play a significant part.
Anger towards buses is London is a perfectly normal reaction :-(
But so unhealthy. Why not just accept them as an inconvenience like bad weather, and get on with life?
Bad weather, in London at least, is unlikely to prove fatal?
You can be unaccepting of their current behaviour by for example campaigning for an improvement whilst accepting current reality and get on with it when you're out there.
Shouting at bus drivers not only is unlikely to educate them, it further sours up the already poor tolerance between various road users. And not least it sours up the pleasurable experience that cycling otherwise can be (yes even when commuting).
In article <[email hidden]>, Dave Larrington [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
Anger towards buses is London is a perfectly normal reaction :-(
But so unhealthy. Why not just accept them as an inconvenience like bad weather, and get on with life?
In this case "just getting on with life" involved carrying on trying to ride a race, which was difficult because of the buses...
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
> Anger towards buses is London is a perfectly normal reaction :-( > But so unhealthy. Why not just accept them as an inconvenience like bad weather, and get on with life?
Bad weather, in London at least, is unlikely to prove fatal?
You can be unaccepting of their current behaviour by for example campaigning for an improvement whilst accepting current reality and get on with it when you're out there.
Shouting at bus drivers not only is unlikely to educate them, it further sours up the already poor tolerance between various road users.
But it does make for good TV, and if I was campaigning for better facilities in London I would be sure to use the TG clip as an example.