Road Cycling · Public discussion

too sad

Started by Henry · · Last activity · 4 posts · 718 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 July 2003
Last activity
27 July 2003
Original author
Henry
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
718
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As much as I am a LA supporter I'm crushed to see Jan go down...what a bad break....

    ie "ride fast, take chances"

  2. yep not the way LA would have wanted it to go either I would imagine as it looks certain he would
    not have lost any major time.

    "henry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As much as I am a LA supporter I'm crushed to see Jan go down...what a bad break....

    ie "ride fast, take chances"

  3. I hate to see this in any sport -- JU was the ultimate challenger for LA -- I agree both were riding
    great -- without the rain and without the crash both would have come in seconds apart

    henry said:

    As much as I am a LA supporter I'm crushed to see Jan go down...what a bad break....

    ie "ride fast, take chances"

  4. The question is that Ullrich was taking more risks than Armstrong in the turns. Lance took time in
    the long stretches and Jan was better at the start and when they passed over the small villages
    (with the carrefours, turns, etc.).

    "henry" <[email hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    As much as I am a LA supporter I'm crushed to see Jan go down...what a bad break....

    ie "ride fast, take chances"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.