General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Tonalin CLA experience

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,283 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
24 February 2005
Last activity
28 February 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,283
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A while back I ordered Tonalin CLA, only to do some more research
    after ordering which made me believe I'd wasted my money. The studies
    seemed to show at most a trivial human response to the stuff.

    However having it I took it anyways. A while back a friend commented
    that I looked more muscular, sure enough I looked in the mirror and
    my arm muscles where quite a bit larger than they used to be.
    Whats interesting is that I get no specific upper body exercise
    beyond typing.

    Several possible confounding factors:
    I also started taking ALCAR again around the same time.

    Unlike those in the failed studies, I wasn't trying to make
    gains in those muscles. Perhaps Tonalin effects only the base
    muscle mass, and has little effect on that gained through exercise?

    I have some fat to lose, but am not seriously obese as those in
    other Tonalin studies where.

    I am a very furry man, which appears to relate to high testosterone
    levels. Perhaps Tonalin has greatest impact in those with high
    testosterone levels. In my 20s I had had a substantial amount of upper
    body muscle without having worked out.

    Any thoughts? Has anyone else noticed a response to this substance
    which
    appears to be substantially greater than studies would indicate should
    happen?

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    A while back I ordered Tonalin CLA, only to do some more research
    after ordering which made me believe I'd wasted my money. The studies
    seemed to show at most a trivial human response to the stuff.

    However having it I took it anyways. A while back a friend commented
    that I looked more muscular, sure enough I looked in the mirror and
    my arm muscles where quite a bit larger than they used to be.
    Whats interesting is that I get no specific upper body exercise
    beyond typing.

    Several possible confounding factors:
    I also started taking ALCAR again around the same time.

    Unlike those in the failed studies, I wasn't trying to make
    gains in those muscles. Perhaps Tonalin effects only the base
    muscle mass, and has little effect on that gained through exercise?

    I have some fat to lose, but am not seriously obese as those in
    other Tonalin studies where.

    I am a very furry man, which appears to relate to high testosterone
    levels. Perhaps Tonalin has greatest impact in those with high
    testosterone levels. In my 20s I had had a substantial amount of upper
    body muscle without having worked out.

    Any thoughts? Has anyone else noticed a response to this substance
    which
    appears to be substantially greater than studies would indicate should
    happen?

    I've taken the Tonalin CLA. Like you, I noticed increased muscle mass. At
    the time I began taking it, I was working out with weights on a daily basis
    and was able to increase the amount of weight used rather quickly. Then I
    became ill for some time and wasn't able to work out at all. Amazingly, no
    muscle mass was lost at all!

    I continued to take the CLA until I read a report about it possibly raising
    blood sugar in diabetics. I'm diabetic. I did some more research and
    decided to stop taking it. Muscle mass slowly began to decrease. I didn't
    notice any difference in my blood sugar. I decided to take it again. This
    time, I was slacking off on my workouts because again, I had been sick.
    This time, I was sick off and on but hadn't regained enough strength to feel
    like working out. I've regained the muscle mass. Weird!

    Hopefully I'll be able to resume my workouts once this current sinus
    infection clears. I'm feeling better, but don't want to push it. Will see
    how things go from there. I know when I resumed my workouts in the past, I
    didn't have to start out with lower weights as I had to prior to taking the
    CLA.

    --
    See my webpage:
    http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm

  3. What doses are you both taking?

    Thanks!

  4. This 1-yr human study showed that CLA increased lean muscle mass. But
    it also raised A1C, lowered HDL and raised LDL.

    Choose your poison.

    Hat tip to tintinet in misc.fitness.health who first posted the link.
    If you're interested more in this, I suggest searching in
    google-groups in misc.health.fitness on CLA. There's several good
    threads with arguments pro and con.

    Adam Becker
    ----------------------------

    http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/79/6/1118

    Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for 1 y reduces body fat mass
    in healthy overweight humans1,2,3
    Jean-Michel Gaullier, Johan Halse, Kjetil Høye, Knut Kristiansen, Hans
    Fagertun, Hogne Vik and Ola Gudmundsen

    1 From the Scandinavian Clinical Research AS (JMG, KK, and OG) and the
    Scandinavian Statistical Services AS (HF), Kjeller, Norway; the
    Betanien Medical Center, Oslo (JH); the Helsetorget Medical Center,
    Elverum, Norway (KH); and the Matforsk (Norwegian Food Research
    Institute), Ås, Norway (HV).

    Background: Short-term trials showed that conjugated linoleic acid
    (CLA) may reduce body fat mass (BFM) and increase lean body mass (LBM),
    but the long-term effect of CLA was not examined.

    Objective: The objective of the study was to ascertain the 1-y effect
    of CLA on body composition and safety in healthy overweight adults
    consuming an ad libitum diet.

    Design: Male and female volunteers (n = 180) with body mass indexes (in
    kg/m2) of 25-30 were included in a double-blind, placebo-controlled
    study. Subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups: CLA-free fatty acid
    (FFA), CLA-triacylglycerol, or placebo (olive oil). Change in BFM, as
    measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, was the primary outcome.
    Secondary outcomes included the effects of CLA on LBM, adverse events,
    and safety variables.

    Results: Mean (± SD) BFM in the CLA-triacylglycerol and CLA-FFA groups
    was 8.7 ± 9.1% and 6.9 ± 9.1%, respectively, lower than that in the
    placebo group (P < 0.001). Subjects receiving CLA-FFA had 1.8 ± 4.3%
    greater LBM than did subjects receiving placebo (P = 0.002). These
    changes were not associated with diet or exercise. LDL increased in the
    CLA-FFA group (P = 0.008), HDL decreased in the CLA-triacylglycerol
    group (P = 0.003), and lipoprotein(a) increased in both CLA groups (P <
    0.001) compared with month 0. Fasting blood glucose concentrations
    remained unchanged in all 3 groups. Glycated hemoglobin rose in all
    groups from month 0 concentrations, but there was no significant
    difference between groups. Adverse events did not differ significantly
    between groups.

    Conclusion: Long-term supplementation with CLA-FFA or
    CLA-triacylglycerol reduces BFM in healthy overweight adults.

    Key Words: Conjugated linoleic acid · body fat mass · lean body
    mass · weight · body mass index · dual-energy X-ray
    absorptiometry · overweight · humans

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.