If you haven't got the hard copy yet
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/tourdefrance2007/0,,2107970,00.html
UK and Europe · Public discussion
Today's Guardian
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- UK and Europe
- Published
- 2 July 2007
- Last activity
- 3 July 2007
- Original author
- Dan Gregory
- Posts
- 5
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 353
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Dan Gregory said:
If you haven't got the hard copy yet
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/tourdefrance2007/0,,2107970,00.htmlSo does that make Richard Virenque winner of the 96 Tour then?
A French winner!
The results were Riis, Ullrich, Virenque. Riis has now been stripped
according to one of those Guardian articles. Ullrich, his teammate, was
presumably taking the same stuff.I can't remember what year Virenque's doping scandal was.
-
in message <[email hidden]>, Ben C
(') said:
On 2007-07-02, Dan Gregory <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
If you haven't got the hard copy yet
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/tourdefrance2007/0,,2107970,00.htmlSo does that make Richard Virenque winner of the 96 Tour then?
A French winner!
The results were Riis, Ullrich, Virenque. Riis has now been stripped
according to one of those Guardian articles. Ullrich, his teammate, was
presumably taking the same stuff.I can't remember what year Virenque's doping scandal was.
This is so stupid. If you're honest and confess, you lose your record. If
you're dishonest and deny, you get to keep it. Let's face it, at least
from the nineteen twenties until now, they were all doping. Taking Riis'
jersey off him is just hypocritical.There may once have been a clean winner of le Tour, but I doubt it. There
may one day be a clean winner of le Tour, but if so, we'll probably never
know for certain.--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; Generally Not Used
;; Except by Middle Aged Computer Scientists -
Simon Brooke said:
in message <[email hidden]>, Ben C
(') said:
On 2007-07-02, Dan Gregory <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
If you haven't got the hard copy yet
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/tourdefrance2007/0,,2107970,00.html
So does that make Richard Virenque winner of the 96 Tour then?A French winner!
The results were Riis, Ullrich, Virenque. Riis has now been stripped
according to one of those Guardian articles. Ullrich, his teammate, was
presumably taking the same stuff.I can't remember what year Virenque's doping scandal was.
This is so stupid. If you're honest and confess, you lose your record. If
you're dishonest and deny, you get to keep it. Let's face it, at least
from the nineteen twenties until now, they were all doping. Taking Riis'
jersey off him is just hypocritical.There may once have been a clean winner of le Tour, but I doubt it. There
may one day be a clean winner of le Tour, but if so, we'll probably never
know for certain.
Spotted [censored] eventually did confess - tearfully. -
Ben C said:
Dan Gregory said:
If you haven't got the hard copy yet
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/tourdefrance2007/0,,2107970,00.htmlSo does that make Richard Virenque winner of the 96 Tour then?
A French winner!
The results were Riis, Ullrich, Virenque. Riis has now been stripped
according to one of those Guardian articles. Ullrich, his teammate, was
presumably taking the same stuff.I can't remember what year Virenque's doping scandal was.
I think someone previously suggested that if you go down that route,
Chris Boardman won it (he was 39th).A British winner!
MikeF
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.