Tire size mixing okay?

Steve Sloan said:

I have a bike I'd like to mix tire sizes on. I can't imagine why this would cause any problem at
all. Here's what I want to do:

I commute about 22 miles a day into downtown San Jose, CA. The transit agency, streets and
traffic, sewer, power and telecom folks seem to be competing with each other trying to see who can
tear up the streets the most! There are potholes and patches on patches. I cross six railroad
tracks. I carry a computer, books in my panniers plus my weight (total about 250 lbs) over this,
the roughest ride I do.

A couple of weeks ago I hit a pothole and bent a rim (and it was a stout rim!) The rim was a Mavic
T220 with 36 14 straight gauge spokes and Top Touring 700x32 tires.

I replaced the bent rim with a bigger Mavic 520 with 36 14 straight gauge spokes.

It was a false economy to use the cheap spokes. You would have been better to spring for butted
spokes--they're not that much more expensive, and result in a sturdier wheel.

Quoted message said:

I am thinking maybe if I increase the rear to 700 x 37 it will give me more of a cushion of air to
protect my rim and frame and support the weight better.

That sounds like a good idea.

Quoted message said:

My front tire/rim are in fine shape and have less of a load. Is there a problem if I run a700 x 32
on the front with the bigger tire in the back?

Nope. Theoretically it will raise the rear end of the bike by 2.5 mm, but that's insignificant.

I address the issue of mixing tires on one of my Websites, see:

sheldonbrown.comtires.htmlOpen ↗

Sheldon "Insert Nickname Here" Brown +-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Is the only reason you are virtuous because that's your | ticket to heaven? Is the only reason
| you don't beat your | children to death because you don't want to go to hell? | It seems to me
| that it's insulting to human beings to | imply that only a system of rewards and punishments
| can | keep you a decent human being. Isn't it conceivable that | a person wants to be a decent
| human being because that | way he feels better? Because that way the world is better? | --Isaac
| Asimov |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.comOpen ↗ Hard-to-find parts
shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.comOpen ↗ sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.comOpen ↗

Steve Sloan said:

I replaced the bent rim with a bigger Mavic 520 with 36 14 straight gauge spokes. I am thinking
maybe if I increase the rear to 700 x 37 it will give me more of a cushion of air to protect my rim
and frame and support the weight better. My front tire/rim are in fine shape and have less of a
load. Is there a problem if I run a700 x 32 on the front with the bigger tire in the back?

I don't think you'll have any problem unless the tire doesn't clear brakes or chainstays. I do it on
the tandem all the time and frequently on singles.

What's marked on the tires frequently doesn't mean much. My Panaracer Pasela 700x35 measures
700x31. My 700x28 Specialized measures 700x32.

If I were breaking stuff as much as you have, I'd consider a more rugged bicycle like a MTB with
some suspension.

"Paul Kopit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Steve Sloan said:

I replaced the bent rim with a bigger Mavic 520 with 36 14 straight gauge spokes. I am thinking
maybe if I increase the rear to 700 x 37 it will

give

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

me more of a cushion of air to protect my rim and frame and support the weight better. My front
tire/rim are in fine shape and have less of a

load.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is there a problem if I run a700 x 32 on the front with the bigger tire

in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the back?

I don't think you'll have any problem unless the tire doesn't clear brakes or chainstays. I do it
on the tandem all the time and frequently on singles.

What's marked on the tires frequently doesn't mean much. My Panaracer Pasela 700x35 measures
700x31. My 700x28 Specialized measures 700x32.

If I were breaking stuff as much as you have, I'd consider a more rugged bicycle like a MTB with
some suspension.

I agree with both Sheldon and Paul. I would add that a quality suspension seatpost and front rack
with front low riding bags can help balance the load.

David Ornee, Western Springs, IL (riding with potholes, RR tracks, and other road hazards)

20 Feb 2003 14:42:29 -0500 Sheldon Brown said:

Steve Sloan wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

My front tire/rim are in fine shape and have less of a load. Is there a problem if I run a700 x
32 on the front with the bigger tire in the back?

Nope. Theoretically it will raise the rear end of the bike by 2.5 mm, but that's insignificant.

Don't forget that the extra weight in the rear will remove at least some of this. He's actually more
likely to come out level this way. Not that it matters at all....

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney [email hidden] Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------