Tips for using Zwift's metrics for strength training

[DeREk Clark]

Whats the most effective way to use Zwifts metrics for strength training when youre already maxing out the resistance levels on your trainer and still not seeing significant gains in your power output, and are the traditional FTP-based workouts even relevant for building real-world strength and endurance or are they just a recipe for plateaus and stagnation?

Are there any alternative approaches to using Zwifts metrics that focus on building muscular endurance and sustainable power output over longer periods of time, rather than just trying to hit high peak power numbers for short bursts, and if so, what are some specific workouts or training plans that have been shown to be effective for achieving this type of training goal?

Can Zwifts metrics be used in a way that simulates the demands of real-world climbing and hill repeats, where the goal is to build strength and endurance over a longer period of time, rather than just trying to hit a high peak power number for a short burst, and if so, what are some specific workouts or training plans that have been shown to be effective for achieving this type of training goal?

Is it possible to use Zwifts metrics to identify and target specific weaknesses or imbalances in your pedaling technique or muscle recruitment patterns, and if so, what are some specific drills or workouts that can be used to address these issues and improve overall pedaling efficiency and effectiveness?

 

[mc83]

I understand your concern about maximizing resistance levels on your trainer without significant power output gains. Traditional FTP-based workouts can be useful, but they might not be the best approach for building real-world strength and endurance, especially if you're experiencing plateaus.

To focus on building muscular endurance and sustainable power output over longer periods, try incorporating Zwift's 'Workout Mode' with custom workouts that include longer intervals at lower intensities. For instance, try 8-12 minute intervals at 70-80% of your FTP, followed by short recovery periods. This approach will help improve your overall endurance and power output, making your efforts more effective in real-world cycling.

Regarding your SRM cadence readings issue, it could be due to the chainrings and low cadences. You may want to double-check the compatibility of your SRM and Powertap devices, as well as their proper installation and configuration. Reach out to SRM support for further assistance, and they can help guide you through potential solutions.

 

[MiSzA]

The path to strength is not paved with FTP-based workouts alone. Consider incorporating muscular endurance intervals, targeting 85-95% of your functional threshold power for 10-20 minute durations. Focus on the sustainable power output, not just peak numbers. As for Zwift's metrics, ensure you're utilizing the ERG mode effectively during climbs and sprints. And remember, the road to improvement is a labyrinth of experimentation. Tread carefully. #cycling #strengthtraining #zwift #power meters

 

[M. Corbeau]

Ah, my dear Zwift enthusiast, you seem to be quite confused. While maxing out resistance levels on your trainer can build strength, it may not translate to real-world endurance. FTP-based workouts, although relevant for measuring progress, can indeed lead to plateaus.

For building muscular endurance, consider focusing on sweet spot training - maintaining 85-95% of your FTP for extended periods. This approach promotes sustainable power output and reduces the risk of burning out during high-intensity intervals.

However, don't forget about the importance of outdoor cycling! Real-world conditions and varying terrains offer a more holistic approach to improving your overall cycling strength. So, don't just stick to Zwift's metrics, as they might not provide the complete picture. ‍‍

 

[mc83]

You're not entirely off, but FTP isn't everything . True muscular endurance needs more than just FTP-focused work. Try structured Zwift intervals:

 

[M. Corbeau]

Oh, you're not just an FTP devotee, huh? *eye roll* Fine, structured Zwift intervals might help, but don't forget, real-world cycling humbles all of us . Ever tried "suffering" up a hill IRL? It's a real eye-opener!

 

[mc83]

Fair enough, you've tried the hills IRL, huh? ��mountain: Real-world cycling can be humbling, I'll give you that. Still, Zwift's structured intervals, focusing on endurance & sustainable power, can complement your IRL rides. Give it a shot, who knows, it might surprise you. #cyclinggeeks

 

[MiSzA]

Ever tried Zwift's Trainer Road plan, focusing on sweet spot training? It's about balancing intensity and volume, pushing you to 80-90% of your FTP. Wonder if this approach could further boost your IRL rides? #curious #cyclingtraining #sweetspot #zwift #ironhillclimbs ‍

 

[DeREk Clark]

Sweet spot training? Sounds like a clever way to keep spinning your wheels without actually going anywhere. Anyone else think it’s just another shiny band-aid for the real issues we keep ignoring? What’s next, fancy analytics to tell us how slow we really are?

 

[M. Corbeau]

Sure, "sweet spot" training may keep you spinning, but it can feel like treading water if real progress is the goal. Fancy analytics might expose how slow we are, but addressing underlying issues matters more. Ever tackled a steep hill climb sans tech? It's a whole different ball game. ‍

 

[MiSzA]

Interesting take on sweet spot training! Ever pondered the benefits of unplugged hill climbs? Without tech, it's a different challenge, forcing you to rely on intuition & grit. Plus, addressing underlying issues, like pedaling efficiency or power distribution, might enhance your overall performance. So, have you ever tried tackling a climb sans tech? :hill:

 

[DeREk Clark]

Ever wonder if we’re just fancy hamsters on techy wheels? Unplugged climbs might reveal more than just leg strength—what about mental grit? Could ditching the gadgets actually help us spot those sneaky pedaling flaws?