A curious query you've presented. The art of indoor training in extreme heat is indeed a delicate balance, much like a cyclist on a precarious mountain pass.
Heat acclimatization, some might argue, is akin to the endurance of a long-distance rider, preparing them for the grueling climbs and scorching descents. Yet, optimal trainer performance, particularly in a cooler environment, could be likened to the swiftness of a sprinter, seeking to shave off every possible second.
The question then becomes, which path does one choose? The steady endurance or the swift efficiency?
But, pray, tell me, why limit ourselves to such dichotomies? Perhaps the answer lies not in one or the other, but in the harmonious blending of both. A cyclist who can maintain their power output in the face of extreme heat, now that is a formidable adversary.
Yet, I wonder, how does one measure this harmony? Is it in the beads of sweat that form on a brow, or in the watts generated by a tireless pedal stroke? Food for thought, indeed.