Can we really say were prioritizing cycling safety in urban environments if were still reinforcing the mantra of be seen, be safe when in reality, many cyclists who follow this advice are still being involved in accidents?
What if the focus on high-visibility gear, glow-in-the-dark helmets and increased reflectivity on clothing is actually a smokescreen that distracts from the more fundamental issue of inadequate urban infrastructure and a lack of meaningful change in driver behavior?
Is it time for us to challenge the status quo and push for a more holistic approach to cycling safety that goes beyond just individual precautions and actually redesigns our urban landscapes to prioritize the needs of vulnerable road users?
What would happen if we took the onus off cyclists to be seen and instead put it on drivers to be aware - would that fundamentally shift the way we think about and design our urban environments?
What if the focus on high-visibility gear, glow-in-the-dark helmets and increased reflectivity on clothing is actually a smokescreen that distracts from the more fundamental issue of inadequate urban infrastructure and a lack of meaningful change in driver behavior?
Is it time for us to challenge the status quo and push for a more holistic approach to cycling safety that goes beyond just individual precautions and actually redesigns our urban landscapes to prioritize the needs of vulnerable road users?
What would happen if we took the onus off cyclists to be seen and instead put it on drivers to be aware - would that fundamentally shift the way we think about and design our urban environments?