Is it more efficient to prioritize water-repellent clothing or a bike with full fenders when it comes to cycling in wet and windy winter weather, or is the emphasis on these components creating a false sense of security? Considering the advancement in materials science, it is reasonable to assume that water-repellent clothing has reached a point where it can sufficiently protect a rider from the elements, eliminating the need for fenders altogether. Conversely, one could argue that fenders provide protection not only for the rider but also for those surrounding them, making them an essential component for safe winter riding.
However, it is worth considering whether the stress on having both water-repellent clothing and a bike with full fenders is unnecessary and leads to a higher overall cost and weight penalty for the rider. Many experienced cyclists claim to be able to navigate challenging conditions without these components, but this begs the question of whether this would be feasible for the average commuter. Are fenders and water-repellent clothing indispensable components of a winter cycling setup, or can they be compromised upon in favor of a more streamlined approach to bike and rider preparation?
However, it is worth considering whether the stress on having both water-repellent clothing and a bike with full fenders is unnecessary and leads to a higher overall cost and weight penalty for the rider. Many experienced cyclists claim to be able to navigate challenging conditions without these components, but this begs the question of whether this would be feasible for the average commuter. Are fenders and water-repellent clothing indispensable components of a winter cycling setup, or can they be compromised upon in favor of a more streamlined approach to bike and rider preparation?