Scott said:On Dec 7, 11:15 am, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:On Dec 7, 11:31 am, Scott <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Without knowing exactly what motivates each individual, how can you
possibly know if they need a reality check?
Quoted message said:dumbass,
Quoted message said:i can perceive it in what they say and how they act.
Quoted message said:i'm involved in local racing and it annoys me to drive around a race
course picking up gu wrappers tossed on the road by museeuw wannabes
who are 20 yrs older than me or riders telling me I shouldn't charge
the top riders an entry fee because that's what they do in belgium.
Quoted message said:i can cite many instances where someone acts like a [censored] or has a
sense of entitlement because they are "a rider".
Hey, I can't argue with your comments above, but that still doesn't
entitle you to state that everyone needs a reality check. Lot's do,
most don't (my opinion).- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So Amit should go to every race, watch every rider, keep a log of just
which riders need to be corrected, and carefully, non-judgementally,
and of course, politcally correctly, non-negatively, suggest positive
alternatives to those particular riders, right??
You'd be happy to volunteer the massive number of hours to, possibly,
avoid offending anyone, right?
I'm with Amit. Make it clear to everyone, you throw [censored] outside the
feed zone you get DQ'ed, or relegated.
You'd rather have the promoter pay clean-up crews, or lose the race
than hold the riders responsible.
Hey, NOONE is respoinsible for their actions, right. it's all
society, or someone else's fault?
Bill C