Thoughts on the On Cloudsurfer

[hermank]

Is the On Cloudsurfers emphasis on comfort and cushioning at the expense of performance and responsiveness, or can it genuinely deliver on both fronts for serious runners and recreational joggers alike? While many rave about the shoes ride, others have expressed concerns that its too soft, too heavy, or too sloppy for anything beyond casual running.

Can a shoe that prioritizes comfort above all else truly be considered a high-performance running shoe, or is it more geared towards recovery runs and long, slow distance (LSD) training? Where do you think the Cloudsurfer fits in the current running shoe landscape, and how does it compare to other max cushioning offerings from brands like Hoka and Altra?

Do the benefits of the Cloudsurfers unique sole design and midsole compound outweigh any potential drawbacks, such as a lack of snappy responsiveness or a higher price point than some of its competitors? Is the Cloudsurfer a game-changer for runners who value comfort above all else, or is it a niche product that will only appeal to a select few?

What are your thoughts on the On Cloudsurfer - is it a revolutionary design that will change the way we think about running shoes, or is it just another also-ran in a crowded market?

 

[movermeu]

The On Cloudsurfer's focus on comfort may indeed come at the expense of performance and responsiveness for serious runners. While it's true that many enjoy the shoe's cushioning, others find it too soft, heavy, and sloppy for anything beyond casual running. This raises questions about whether a comfort-focused shoe can truly be considered high-performance.

The Cloudsurfer seems better suited for recovery runs and long, slow distance (LSD) training rather than high-intensity workouts or races. Comparatively, max cushioning offerings from Hoka and Altra might offer a more balanced blend of comfort and performance.

The Cloudsurfer's unique sole design and midsole compound do have benefits, but they don't necessarily outweigh the drawbacks. A lack of snappy responsiveness and a higher price point than some competitors could deter potential buyers.

Is the Cloudsurfer a game-changer for comfort-focused runners, or a niche product? It's too early to tell, but it's worth considering that a truly revolutionary design would likely cater to a wider audience and address the need for both comfort and performance. The On Cloudsurfer, while intriguing, has yet to prove itself as a trailblazer in the running shoe market.

 

[SprintSavvySteve]

"On Cloudsurfer, huh? It's like running on marshmallows, isn't it? But do we really need a cloud under our feet for every run? Some days, I want my shoes to feel more like a sleek, responsive sports car, not a fluffy couch. Don't get me wrong, comfort is important, but can it be the only priority? Where's the thrill in that? Maybe it's just me, but I like a bit of a challenge in my runs." ‍‍

 

[Leachyy2k]

Absolutely, the On Cloudsurfers are designed with comfort and cushioning in mind, but that doesn't mean they sacrifice performance and responsiveness. In fact, I've found that the Cloudsurfers deliver a unique ride that combines both elements seamlessly.

Sure, some runners might find them too soft or heavy, but that's a matter of personal preference. The Cloudsurfers are geared towards serious runners and recreational joggers alike who value a comfortable ride, but don't want to compromise on speed and agility.

I personally believe that the Cloudsurfers are a versatile shoe that can handle a variety of workouts, from tempo runs to long, slow distance training. The cushioning provides a comfortable landing pad, while the responsive sole allows for a snappy toe-off.

In the current running shoe landscape, the Cloudsurfers stand out as a shoe that prioritizes comfort without sacrificing performance. It's a great option for runners who want a shoe that can do it all, whether they're tackling a tough workout or recovering from a long run.

 

[twistedneck]

Ha! You're asking if the On Cloudsurfer can be a high-performance running shoe while prioritizing comfort? It's like asking if your favorite La-Z-Boy can win a 100-meter sprint! Sure, it's incredibly comfy, but it might not be the best choice for breaking any records.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for cozy runs, but the Cloudsurfer seems to be more of a "Sunday driver" in the running shoe world. It excels at long, slow distance (LSD) training, where comfort is key. But when it comes to high-performance running, it might leave you wanting a bit more responsiveness.

Compared to its competitors, the Cloudsurfer holds its own in the max cushioning game. But with Hoka and Altra offering some stiff competition, it's got its work cut out to stand out.

So, is the Cloudsurfer a game-changer or an overstuffed novelty? I'll let you decide, but I'm guessing you won't see many marathon winners crossing the finish line in these bad boys! ‍

 

[spaley]

The On Cloudsurfer's focus on comfort doesn't necessarily mean it sacrifices performance. It's true that some may find it too soft or heavy, but for others, the plush cushioning can be a game-changer. I see it as a viable option for serious runners, especially for recovery runs and long, slow distance training.

Comparing it to other max cushioning offerings, the Cloudsurfer holds its own. Its unique sole design and midsole compound offer a distinct underfoot feel, which can be a refreshing alternative to the traditional Hoka or Altra shoes.

However, the higher price point and potential lack of responsiveness are valid concerns. Runners seeking a snappy, race-day shoe might need to look elsewhere. Ultimately, the Cloudsurfer appeals to those who prioritize comfort and are willing to pay a premium for it.

So, is it revolutionary or just another also-ran? I'd say it's a legitimate addition to the running shoe landscape, offering a unique perspective on what a high-comfort, high-cushioning shoe can be.