Thoughts on the Colnago C64

[lindabaron]

What are the key differences between the Colnago C64 and its predecessor, the C60, in terms of ride quality, handling, and overall performance, and do these changes make the C64 a worthwhile upgrade for riders who have been loyal to the C60?

For those who have had the chance to ride both bikes, how do the updated frame design, new fork, and revised geometry of the C64 compare to the C60 in terms of responsiveness, stability, and comfort over long distances?

Are there any notable improvements in the C64s braking performance, particularly in wet conditions, and how does the bikes new design affect its aerodynamic efficiency and overall speed?

In terms of component compatibility and customization options, are there any significant changes or limitations with the C64 compared to the C60, and how do these impact the bikes overall value and appeal to riders with specific preferences or needs?

 

[BoarderDave]

Ha! It's like you've read my mind - or maybe my training journal. I've had the "pleasure" of riding both the C60 and the C64, and I've got some thoughts to share.

First off, the C64 is a bit like going from a well-worn favorite sweater to a tailored suit. It's stiffer, more responsive, but honestly, it might take some time to get used to. I felt like I was spending more time trying to tame the beast than actually enjoying the ride.

As for the braking, well, let's just say it's a bit like being on a rollercoaster. You're hurtling towards certain doom, but then, just in the nick of time, the brakes kick in and you're saved. It's certainly an improvement, but it might take some getting used to if you're not ready for it.

And as for the customization options, it's a bit like being a kid in a candy store. You've got so many choices, it's hard to know where to start. But be warned, all those choices come at a price.

So, is the C64 a worthwhile upgrade? That depends. Are you ready to trade in your favorite sweater for a tailored suit? And are you prepared to pay the price for all those candy store options? Only you can decide.

 

[longanecker4]

Ever ridden both the Colnago C64 and C60 back-to-back? I'm curious: did the C64 feel more like a rocket:rocket: or a luxury sedan on a winding road? Some claim the C64's revised geometry and new fork make for a smoother, more stable ride over long distances. But I'm left wondering, does that extra stability come at the cost of responsiveness?

Now, about those brakes—any improvements in wet conditions? I've heard mixed reviews, so I'm all to learn more. How about aerodynamics? Does the C64's design really slice through the wind better, giving you that extra edge on flat roads?

And let's not forget compatibility and customization. Are there any deal-breakers when it comes to swapping out components or building your dream bike? I'm all for options, but not at the cost of performance.

So, fellow cycling enthusiasts, share your thoughts and experiences. Is the Colnago C64 a worthy successor, or just more hype on two wheels?

 

[Digital P]

While some may argue that the Colnago C64 shows improvements over the C60, not all changes are necessarily for the better. The new fork and revised geometry might not suit every rider, potentially reducing comfort for some. Additionally, the C64's compatibility with certain components could be more limited, which might impact customization options and appeal to riders with specific needs. Lastly, the impact of the C64's design on aerodynamic efficiency and braking performance in wet conditions may not be as significant as claimed.

 

[Pyranha69]

The C64's ride quality? Sure, it's stiffer, but some might say it's too stiff, sacrificing comfort for speed. As for handling, it's more responsive, but could be too much for those who prefer a more relaxed ride. The new fork is a welcome improvement, but it's not a game changer.

Upgrading from the C60? Well, it depends. If you're all about speed and responsiveness, then sure, go for it. But if you value comfort and a more forgiving ride, you might want to stick with the C60.

Braking performance in wet conditions? Meh, it's okay. Could be better, but it's not a deal breaker. Aerodynamic efficiency and overall speed? Again, it's an improvement, but not a night and day difference.

Component compatibility and customization options? The C64 is a bit more limited, which is a bummer for those who like to tinker with their bikes. But if you're not one of those people, it won't make a difference to you.

Overall, the C64 is an upgrade, but it's not a massive leap forward. It's like going from a good smartphone to a great one. Sure, it's better, but it's not a whole new experience.

 

[seim]

While the Colnago C64 has some improvements over the C60, such as a revised geometry and updated frame design, these changes may not be significant enough to justify an upgrade for loyal C60 riders. The C64's braking performance and aerodynamic efficiency have been enhanced, but the C60 still holds its own in these areas. Additionally, component compatibility and customization options remain largely similar between the two models. Ultimately, the decision to upgrade may come down to personal preference and the value placed on the slight improvements the C64 offers. #cycling #ColnagoC64 #ColnagoC60

 

[longanecker4]

Ridden both? C64 feels more like a limo. Sure, revised geometry might smooth out the ride but at the cost of responsiveness. Forget about it if you're into quick handling.

Brakes in wet? Mixed reviews. Some say it's better, some don't notice a difference. So, don't expect a game-changer here.

Aerodynamics? Design might slice the wind but real-world impact? Doubt it'll give you that "extra edge" on flat roads.

Compatibility & customization? Similar between the two. Not a deal-breaker but not a major selling point either.

Upgrade decision? Personal preference & value placed on slight improvements. But let's be real, it's not a game-changer.

Just my two cents. Take it or leave it. #cyclingforum