Those Xray images again

Response to Tony Raven:

Quoted message said:

It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm

They certainly offer a graphic demonstration of how much larger the
effective size of the head is with a helmet on. </bright side>

I now have to remember to delete the X-Face header... ;-)

--
Mark, UK
"The Internet was a better place when you had to TRY to get on it."

Mark McNeill twisted the electrons to say:

Quoted message said:

Response to Tony Raven:

Quoted message said:

It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm

They certainly offer a graphic demonstration of how much larger the
effective size of the head is with a helmet on. </bright side>

They also provide a graphic demonstration of how much of the head they
don't provide any protection[1] for ...

[1] In so far as polystyrene hats can be said to offer protection.
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...

In article said:

It appears that those appalling cycle helmet xray images are back on a
Government website with a whole load of misleading propaganda associated
with them. Didn't the Government agree not to use them?
http://www.cyclesense.net/homepages/02.htm

That was the boring old government, this is the dynamic new government.
Or something.

Quoted message said:

That was the boring old government, this is the dynamic new government.
Or something.

Its definitely more "or something" than "dynamic". If you email the
website a comment you get "Mail delivery failed: returning message to
sender".

[censored] our what?
--
bob