Whats with the notion that tubeless tires are only for the young and reckless, while the older generation clings to their trusty tubes? Is it really just a matter of age, or is there more to it? Are the naysayers simply stuck in their ways, refusing to adapt to the benefits of tubeless, or are there legitimate concerns that are being overlooked?
Does the fact that many pros are now running tubeless have more to do with sponsorship deals than actual performance gains? Are the perceived advantages of tubeless - increased traction, reduced flats, and improved ride quality - simply a result of better tire design and materials, rather than the lack of tubes themselves?
And what about the argument that tubeless is more difficult to set up and maintain? Is this just a myth perpetuated by those who are intimidated by the process, or is there some truth to it? Are the benefits of tubeless really worth the hassle and potential pitfalls, or are tubes still the way to go for the average rider?
Does the fact that many pros are now running tubeless have more to do with sponsorship deals than actual performance gains? Are the perceived advantages of tubeless - increased traction, reduced flats, and improved ride quality - simply a result of better tire design and materials, rather than the lack of tubes themselves?
And what about the argument that tubeless is more difficult to set up and maintain? Is this just a myth perpetuated by those who are intimidated by the process, or is there some truth to it? Are the benefits of tubeless really worth the hassle and potential pitfalls, or are tubes still the way to go for the average rider?