The real deal

Arthg said:

cyclingnews.com/tour04.php?id=photos/2004/tour04/stage3/S-
ARMSTRONGULLRICHPAVE

Again, very very strange brakehoods position.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Ewoud Dronkert said:

cyclingnews.com/tour04.php?id=photos/2004/tour04/stage3/S-
ARMSTRONG ULLRICHPAVE

There has been a trend in recent years toward putting the
hoods further up the bars, but those are about 10 degrees
further north than any others I've noticed. The other T-
Mob guy (fifth wheel) in that shot looks to have his sort
of high , but nowhere near as high as Armstrong's. Same
for Cipo: cyclingnews.comtour04.phpOpen ↗
s/2004/tour04/stage2/25

--
tanx, Howard

So far, so good, so what?

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Ewoud Dronkert said:

Arthg said:

clingnews.com/tour04.php?id=photos/2004/tour04/stage3/S-
ARMSTRO NGULLRICHPAVE

Again, very very strange brakehoods position.

Just came across this shot:clingnews.com/photos/2004/tour04/tech/?id=usps_stage3/CN-
TDF04- Tech35_LA_trek

--
tanx, Howard

So far, so good, so what?

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Howard Kveck said:

Just came across this shot:yclingnews.com/photos/2004/tour04/tech/?id=usps_stage3/CN-
TDF04-Tech35_LA_trek

I guess if one has a crooked back, and surplus power to
compensate a higher position, this is what it comes to.