Whats the deal with the keto diet being touted as a miracle solution for cyclists, only to have it completely backfire for many of us? Ive seen countless threads and articles praising its supposed benefits, from increased fat burning to enhanced endurance, but the reality is that its left a lot of riders feeling drained, sluggish, and utterly disappointed.
Is it just me, or does it seem like the keto crowd is more concerned with looking good on Instagram than actually performing well on the bike? I mean, who needs to be able to sustain a high pace for hours on end when you can just post a selfie with a six-pack, right?
But seriously, whats going on here? Is it a matter of the keto diet being fundamentally incompatible with the demands of cycling, or are we just not doing it right? Are there any actual studies or data to support the claim that keto is beneficial for cyclists, or is this just another case of bro-science gone wild?
And while were at it, can we talk about the whole fat adaptation thing? Ive heard it claimed that keto helps your body adapt to burning fat for fuel, but isnt that just a fancy way of saying youre not eating enough carbs to support your energy needs? I mean, if Im burning fat for fuel, thats great and all, but what about when I need to sprint up a hill or respond to an attack? Dont I need some actual energy reserves for that?
And what about the whole inflammation thing? Ive seen keto proponents claim that it reduces inflammation, but isnt that just a correlation-causation fallacy? Maybe the people who are doing keto are just eating more anti-inflammatory foods, or maybe theyre just not riding as hard because theyre too busy feeling miserable from lack of carbs.
Im not trying to be a keto hater or anything, but it seems like theres a lot of hype surrounding this diet that just doesnt add up. So, can someone please explain to me whats going on here, and why keto seems to be such a disaster for so many cyclists?
Is it just me, or does it seem like the keto crowd is more concerned with looking good on Instagram than actually performing well on the bike? I mean, who needs to be able to sustain a high pace for hours on end when you can just post a selfie with a six-pack, right?
But seriously, whats going on here? Is it a matter of the keto diet being fundamentally incompatible with the demands of cycling, or are we just not doing it right? Are there any actual studies or data to support the claim that keto is beneficial for cyclists, or is this just another case of bro-science gone wild?
And while were at it, can we talk about the whole fat adaptation thing? Ive heard it claimed that keto helps your body adapt to burning fat for fuel, but isnt that just a fancy way of saying youre not eating enough carbs to support your energy needs? I mean, if Im burning fat for fuel, thats great and all, but what about when I need to sprint up a hill or respond to an attack? Dont I need some actual energy reserves for that?
And what about the whole inflammation thing? Ive seen keto proponents claim that it reduces inflammation, but isnt that just a correlation-causation fallacy? Maybe the people who are doing keto are just eating more anti-inflammatory foods, or maybe theyre just not riding as hard because theyre too busy feeling miserable from lack of carbs.
Im not trying to be a keto hater or anything, but it seems like theres a lot of hype surrounding this diet that just doesnt add up. So, can someone please explain to me whats going on here, and why keto seems to be such a disaster for so many cyclists?