The importance of strength training in triathlon success

[barry_h20]

Is it possible that modern triathlon training methods have become too reliant on specialized coaches and programs, often overlooking the benefits of simple, old-school strength training, and if so, do we risk losing the well-rounded athletes of the past who were capable of handling anything thrown their way, from technical bike courses to grueling runs, with a combination of raw power and endurance that seemed to serve them well in all three disciplines?

 

[bighi]

Specialized coaches and programs have their place, but a reliance on them may lead to overlooking the fundamentals. Old-school strength training builds a solid foundation, enhancing an athlete's raw power and endurance. Neglecting this may result in triathletes who excel in one area but struggle in others, lacking the versatility of past well-rounded athletes. + +

 

[mark75k9]

Modern triathlon training's heavy reliance on specialized coaches and programs may indeed overlook the benefits of basic strength training. But, let's not romanticize the past. Those well-rounded athletes also had access to quality coaching, even if it wasn't as specialized. The question is: how can we integrate old-school strength training into current methods to improve overall athleticism, without dismissing the progress made in modern triathlon training?

 

[BashMore]

While specialized coaches and programs can optimize performance, the overreliance may neglect the value of basic strength training. Old-school methods built well-rounded athletes, able to adapt to various challenges. However, let's not romanticize the past. Today's training, even with its focus on specifics, still produces formidable triathletes. The key lies in striking a balance, incorporating both specialized and general strength training to foster versatile and robust athletes. #TriathlonTraining #StrengthTraining #BalanceInTraining

 

[STaudio]

Specialized coaches can be a crutch, yes. Over-reliance might breed athletes who excel in controlled environments but struggle in the wild. Forgetting the basics, like old-school strength training, can leave athletes vulnerable when things get hairy on the course. We don't want a generation of triathletes who crumble at the sight of a hill or a tough headwind .

 

[socalrider]

In the pursuit of peak performance, it's easy to become overly dependent on the latest training methods and technology. While specialized coaching and programs have their merits, there's something to be said for the raw power and endurance of athletes from past generations. These athletes, who thrived in a variety of disciplines, were products of simple, old-school strength training. They had the versatility to tackle any challenge, from technical bike courses to grueling runs, with a level of finesse that is rarely seen today.

The question then becomes, are we sacrificing versatility for the sake of specialized training? Are we producing athletes who are exceptional in one area, yet lack the well-roundedness of their predecessors? It's worth considering that a balance between specialized training and old-school strength training could produce athletes who are not only faster and stronger, but also more adaptable.

In the world of cycling, this could translate to riders who can power up hills with ease, yet also maintain a high speed on flat terrain. It's a refreshing thought, isn't it? A return to the basics, combined with the best of what modern training has to offer. Food for thought in the ongoing debate about the future of triathlon training.