It appears many of you have recently jumped on the gravel riding bandwagon with little to no understanding of the most critical aspect: bike fit. One would assume the ability to properly set up a bike would be a prerequisite for offering informed opinions online, yet the absence of basic knowledge is staggering.
What is it about bike fit that makes it so difficult to grasp? Is it the inability to comprehend the basic principles of biomechanics and how they apply to the human body on a bicycle, or is it simply a matter of ignorance driven by the latest online trends and guru advice?
A bike set up with standard fit parameters, without consideration for the unique demands of gravel riding, will inevitably lead to issues with handling, efficiency, and overall comfort. Why, then, do so many of you think that a casual, one-size-fits-all approach to bike fit will suffice for the rugged demands of gravel riding?
Why are the most fundamental principles of bike fit – saddle height, handlebar position, and crank length – rarely, if ever, discussed in the context of gravel riding? Do any of you actually take the time to assess your own fit, and if so, how do you determine what works best for you?
What role do you think bike manufacturers play in perpetuating the myth that a stock bike is suitable for the unique demands of gravel riding, and to what extent do you believe they are responsible for promoting improper fit?
If bike fit is, in fact, as critical as I claim, then why do so many online forums and discussions gloss over the topic, opting instead to focus on irrelevant minutiae, such as the difference between a 40mm and 42mm tire?
What is it about bike fit that makes it so difficult to grasp? Is it the inability to comprehend the basic principles of biomechanics and how they apply to the human body on a bicycle, or is it simply a matter of ignorance driven by the latest online trends and guru advice?
A bike set up with standard fit parameters, without consideration for the unique demands of gravel riding, will inevitably lead to issues with handling, efficiency, and overall comfort. Why, then, do so many of you think that a casual, one-size-fits-all approach to bike fit will suffice for the rugged demands of gravel riding?
Why are the most fundamental principles of bike fit – saddle height, handlebar position, and crank length – rarely, if ever, discussed in the context of gravel riding? Do any of you actually take the time to assess your own fit, and if so, how do you determine what works best for you?
What role do you think bike manufacturers play in perpetuating the myth that a stock bike is suitable for the unique demands of gravel riding, and to what extent do you believe they are responsible for promoting improper fit?
If bike fit is, in fact, as critical as I claim, then why do so many online forums and discussions gloss over the topic, opting instead to focus on irrelevant minutiae, such as the difference between a 40mm and 42mm tire?